Friday, December 28, 2012

EPIDURAL DANGERS AND SIDE EFFECTS

Photo by Patti Ramos - http://pattiramos.com

Source Article:
Natural childbirth V: epidural side effects and risks
http://chriskresser.com/natural-childbirth-v-epidural-side-effects-and-risks

"Before we dive into a discussion of epidural analgesia I’d like to clarify my intention in writing this series in light of some of the comments on previous articles.

The purpose of this series on natural childbirth is to demonstrate that homebirth is as safe – if not safer – than hospital birth for low risk pregnancies, and that medical interventions commonly used in hospital births such as epidurals, induction with synthetic oxytocin and cesarean sections have risks and complications that are often not communicated to pregnant women.

Currently fewer than 1% of births happen at home in the U.S., and I believe this is largely due to misconceptions about its safety. My intention here is to correct those misconceptions.

The purpose of this series is not to condemn the use of these interventions in all circumstances. All of them have their place, and can be very helpful and even life-saving (for mothers and babies) when used appropriately. In fact, I said the following in bold text at the end of the first article in this series:

I want to be clear: no matter where birth takes place, complications may arise that require medical intervention and I am 100% in support of it in these cases.

There is still much we don’t understand about birth, and even more we don’t have direct control over. In some cases, despite a woman’s best efforts to have a natural, undisturbed birth, complications arise that require medical attention (and transfer to a hospital if she started laboring at home). In these circumstances, I absolutely endorse taking advantage of whatever interventions may protect the health and safety of both the mother and baby. At the end of the day, that is far, far more important than the method by which the baby was born.

I also want to be clear that I am not judging women who choose to have hospital births, receive epidurals, induce with Pitocin or end up having a cesarean section. I respect the right of women to choose a method of childbirth that feels safe and comfortable for them.

My purpose, instead, is to tell the side of the story that women are often not told, and to raise awareness of the risks associated with these procedures so that when it comes time to make their own decision, women are adequately educated and informed to do so.
What is an epidural and how common are they?

Dr. Leonard J. Corning, a neurologist in New York, was the first physician to use an epidural. In 1885 he injected cocaine into the back of a patient suffering from spinal weakness and seminal incontinence.

Today, epidurals are by far the most popular method of pain relief during labor in U.S. hospitals. According to the Listening to Mothers II survey (2006), more than 75 percent of women reported that they received an epidural, including 71 percent of women who had a vaginal birth. In Canada in 2005-2006, 54 percent of women who gave birth vaginally used an epidural, and during those same years in England, 22 percent of women overall had an epidural before or during delivery.

In an epidural, a local anesthetic – still derived from cocaine – is injected into the epidural space (the space around the tough coverings that protect the spinal cord). Epidurals block nerve signals from both the sensory and motor nerves, which provides effective pain relief but immobilizes the lower part of the recipient’s body.

In the last decade, a new type of epidural has been developed (called “walking epidurals”) that reduce the motor block and allow some mobility.

Spinal analgesia (a.k.a. “spinals”) are also used for pain relief during labor, but unlike conventional epidurals, they allow women to move during labor. In a spinal, the analgesic drug is injected directly into the spinal space through the dura, producing fast-acting, short-term pain relief.
Epidurals have significant impacts on all hormones of labor

In the last article, Natural Childbirth IV: The Hormones of Birth, we discussed the exquisite orchestration of hormones during birth and the risks of interfering with the body’s natural hormone regulation.

Unfortunately, epidurals interfere with all of the hormones we discussed.

They inhibit beta-endorphin production, which in turn shuts down the shift in consciousness (“going to another planet”) that characterizes undisturbed birth.

Epidurals reduce oxytocin production or keep it from rising during labor. They also blunt the oxytocin peak that would otherwise occur at the time of birth because the stretching receptors of a woman’s lower vagina (which trigger the peak) are numbed.

As Dr. Sarah Buckley explains 1:

A woman laboring with an epidural therefore misses out on the final powerful contractions of labor and must use her own effort, often against gravity, to compensate for this loss. This explains the increased length of the second stage of labor and the increased need for forceps when an epidural is used.

Epidurals have also been shown to inhibit catecholamine (CA) production. Remember that CA can slow or stop labor in the early stages, but it promotes the fetus ejection reflex in the second stage of labor. Thus inhibiting CA production may make delivery more difficult.

Epidurals limit release of prostaglandin F2 alpha, a lipid compound that stimulates uterine contractions and is thought to be involved with the initiation of labor. Prostaglandin F2 alpha levels should naturally rise during an undisturbed labor. However, in one study women with epidurals experienced a decrease in PGF2 alpha and a consequent increase in labor times from 4.7 to 7.8 hours.

Epidurals interfere with labor and have side effects for mothers

Epidurals have been shown to have the following effects on labor and laboring mothers:

They lengthen labor.

They triple the risk of severe perineal tear.

They may increase the risk of cesarean section by 2.5 times.

They triple the occurrence of induction with synthetic oxytocin (Pitocin).

They quadruple the chances a baby will be persistently posterior (POP, face up) in the final stages of labor, which in turn decreases the chances of spontaneous vaginal birth (see below).

They decrease the chances of spontaneous vaginal delivery. In 6 of 9 studies reviewed in one analysis, less than half of women who received an epidural had a spontaneous vaginal delivery.

They increase the chances of complications from instrumental delivery. When women with an epidural had a forceps delivery, the amount of force used by the clinician was almost double that used when an epidural was not in place. This is significant because instrumental deliveries can increase the short-term risks of bruising, facial injuries, displacement of skull bones and blood clots in the scalp for babies, and of episiotomy and tears to the vagina and perineum in mothers.

They increase the risk of pelvic floor problems (urinary, anal and sexual disorders) in mothers after birth, which rarely resolve spontaneously.

One important thing to note about these studies: in most of them, the women in the “control” groups were given opiate painkillers, which are also known to disrupt the natural hormonal processes of birth. We can assume, then, that a comparison of women using no drugs during labor would have revealed even more substantial differences.

Epidural also have side effects for babies

It’s important to understand that drugs administered by epidural enter the baby’s bloodstream at equal and sometimes even higher levels than those present in the mother’s bloodstream.

However, because babies’ immune systems are immature, it takes longer for them to eliminate epidural drugs. For example, the half-life of bupivacaine, a commonly used epidural analgesic, is 2.7 hours in an adult but close to 8 hours in a newborn. 2

Studies have found detectable amounts of bupivacain metabolites in the urine of exposed newborns for 36 hours following spinal anesthesia for cesarians.

Some studies have found deficits in newborn abilities that are consistent with the known toxicity of drugs used in epidurals.

Other studies have found that local anesthetics used in epidurals may adversely effect the newborn immune system, possibly by activating the stress response.

There is evidence that epidurals can compromise fetal blood and oxygen supply, probably via the decrease in maternal blood pressure that epidurals are known to cause.

Epidurals have been shown to cause fetal bradycardia, a decrease in the fetal heart rate (FHR). This is probably secondary to the decrease in maternal CA caused by epidurals which in turn leads to low blood pressure and uterine hyper-stimulation.

Epidurals can cause maternal fever, which in turn may affect the baby. In a large study of first-time moms, babies born to mothers with fever (97% of whom had epidurals) were more likely to be in poor condition (low APGAR scores) at birth, to have poor tone, to require resuscitation and to have seizures in the newborn period, compared to babies born to mothers without fever.

Older studies using the more exacting Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS, devised by pediatricians) rather than the newer, highly criticized Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Score (NACS, devised by anesthesiologists – can you say “conflict of interest”?) found significant neurobehavioral effects in babies exposed to epidurals.

In one such study, researchers found less alertness and ability to orient, and less mature motor abilities, for the first month of life. These findings were in proportion to the dose of bupivacaine administered, suggesting a dose-related response.

Epidurals may interfere with mother-baby bonding and breastfeeding

Some studies suggest that epidurals may interfere with the normal bonding that occurs between mothers and babies just after birth.

In one study, mothers given epidurals spent less time with their babies
in the hospital. The higher doses of drugs they received, the less time they spent.

In another study, mothers who had epidurals described their babies as more difficult to care for one month later than mothers who hadn’t had an epidural.

It’s important to note that neither of these studies prove that epidurals were the cause of the behavioral changes observed. However, if epidurals were at fault, the effects are most likely caused by their interference with the natural orchestration of hormones we discussed in the previous post, and may also be influenced by drug toxicity and the complications associated with epidural births: long labors, forceps and cesareans.

There is also evidence that epidurals may decrease breastfeeding efficiency.

In one study, researchers used the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) and found scores highest amongst unmedicated babies, lower for babies exposed to epidurals and IV opiates, and lowest for babies exposed to both.

A large prospective study found that women who had used epidurals were more than 2 times as likely to have stopped breastfeeding by 24 weeks compared with women who used non-pharmacological pain relief.

Conclusion

Epidural analgesia is a highly effective form of pain relief and a useful intervention in certain circumstances.

However, epidurals and spinals also cause unintended side effects in both the mother and baby, and interfere with the natural birth process and bonding between mother & baby.

In some cases epidurals may be beneficial, but the evidence suggests that they should not be used as routinely as they currently are in the U.S. and other industrialized countries."

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

MALE CIRCUMCISION CAUSES SEXUAL DIFFICULTIES FOR MEN AND FEMALE PARTNERS

WARNING - GRAPHIC IMAGES OF A CIRCUMCISED PENIS AND AN INTACT PENIS ARE CONTAINED IN THIS POST.


Circumcision removes the most sensitive part of the penis (the foreskin). After the protective foreskin is removed, the exposed glans becomes rough and calloused in order to protect itself from the elements (and things like denim pants). This callousing causes an even further removal of sensitivity and the need for men to thrust and thrust in order to get enough sensation for release.

Moreover, the exposed rim of the circumcised penis causes an unnatural drying of the female vagina as the juices inside the woman get trapped around the rim and pulled out of the female body every time the circumcised man pulls out. This would not happen if the man had his foreskin because the foreskin would naturally cover the rim of the penis as it pulls out and then naturally uncover the penis (and the sexual juices) as the penis re-enters the vagina again.

I could go, but hopefully you are getting the picture. CIRCUMCISION IS RITUAL SEXUAL TORTURE AND ABUSE. IT MUST END!

THIS PICTURE REVEALS THE EXQUISITE SENSITIVITY OF THE NATURAL PENIS AND THE BRUTAL CALLOUSING OF THE GLANS THAT TAKES PLACE AFTER CIRCUMCISION.




TO READ MORE ABOUT THE NEW STUDY, FOLLOW THIS LINK: http://www.examiner.com/family-health-in-washington-dc/new-study-male-circumcision-and-sexual-difficulties-for-men-and-female-partners?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150208521318655_16954527_10150209374793655#f157a47fc8794d4

Saturday, December 8, 2012

BREASTMILK ROCKS!!!



In addition to all of the amazing information you will read below, it should be noted that breastmilk is LIVING food, whereas chemical and GMO-laden infant formula is DEAD food.

Breastmilk contains consciousness, and allows mothers to pass on all their knowledge about creation to their child through breastfeeding.

Infant formula, on the other hand, will not allow a transmission of information from mother to child, and will actually undermine the child's ability to understand Source and his/her natural place in creation. And because it contains genetically modified foods, it will also scramble the DNA of the child and undermine his/her full potential.

Also it should be noted that mothers can pass on their feelings through breastmilk, and breastmilk will change in consistency, taste and flow depending on how the mother is feeling. If the mother is feeling stressed, depressed, worried, or afraid, all of these feelings can alter her milk supply not only in taste, but also in texture, quantity, and quality.

If a mother cannot breastfeed for any reason, it is extremely beneficial to avoid infant formula and seek out a brestmilk donor through organizations like Human Milk 4 Human Babies or Eats on Feets.


By Hilary Butler - Wednesday, October 10, 2012
"Stem cells are a big deal.

And frankly, cord blood should not be stored, because the primary reason for stem cells in cord blood is that the baby NEEDS that stem cell transfusion at birth. It's not "medical waste" as it was once called, ... it's nature's first stem cell transfusion.....Baby's blood thickened with vitamin K, causes a situation where stem cells have to move through sludge, not nicely greased blood vessels full of blood which can allow stem cells easy acess to anywhere. Maybe one day it will dawn on the medical profession that not only are cord blood stem cells important and useful to the newborn baby, but that stem cells need thin blood for a reason.....breast milk has stem cells by the truck load. Even more spectacularly, these stem cells are identical to embryonic stem cells...

Breast milk is NOT just food.

Breast milk has functions which go far beyond nutrition.

Breast milk has a dramatic and long term effect not only on the immune system development, but gut flora, allergy, brain development, and other health parameters.

Breast milk is an immune regulator, a hormone conductor, a bone density wizard and a genetic blueprint scanner.

It is a gene methylator, and two years of breast milk lays, stabilised and solidifies the core genetic manual of health for your child, for that child’s whole life.

Add stem cells to that list."
Source Article:
Breastmilk stem cells
http://www.beyondconformity.org.nz/_blog/Hilary%27s_Desk/post/Breastmilk_stem_cells/

Friday, December 7, 2012

COURT RULES SCHOOLS CAN VACCINATE CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS FIVE WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT

When U.S. Courts begin ruling that schools can vaccinate children as young as 5 without parental consent, it's a good time to begin thinking about moving out of the U.S.




***MUST WATCH*** courts rule schools can vaccinate a child without parental consent
http://youtu.be/kACSd-yTEnA

Thursday, December 6, 2012

KAISER PERMANENTE ADVISES MEMBERS TO AVOID GMO FOODS

Rats fed GMO food develop Massive Tumors


Medical Insurance Companies are not stupid. They know darn well that people who eat genetically modified foods are going to get sick. Very sick. Advising their members to avoid GMO foods will likely save them millions of dollars in pay-outs.

Via The Food Revolution Network
"Did you know that Kaiser Permanente, the largest managed healthcare organization in the United States, has published a newsletter advising members to avoid GMOs (genetically modified organisms) in food?

In a Fall 2012 newsletter, Kaiser provided this guidance:

“What do soda, canned chicken soup, margarine, and corn flakes have in common? They all contain genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. GMOs have a piece of DNA from a different species, such as bacteria or viruses, spliced into their DNA. Genetically engineered corn, for example, has DNA added so that it has a pesticide built right into it. This process creates a new species of plant that would have never occurred in nature.”

The $47 billion corporate giant continued:

“Despite what the biotech industry might say, there is little research on the long-term effects of GMOs on human health. Independent research has found several varieties of GMO corn caused organ damage in rats. Other studies have found that GMOs may lead to an inability in animals to reproduce.”

The article encourages Kaiser’s 9 million members to “limit… exposure to GMOs.”

None of this is particularly revolutionary, and the organization still says it has no “official policy” on the GMO issue. But it is the first time that a health care company of this size has publicly encouraged consumers to avoid GMOs. And it is another piece of evidence that the tide is turning.

Americans may still see mandatory labeling of GMOs, and see it soon.

While state-by-state initiatives gain ground, the Food Revolution Network is promoting labeling at the national level through our petition to the US Congress. We’ve partnered with Care2, the Institute for Responsible Technology, and many other organizations, and our petition now has more than 60,000 signers. Thank you for being one of them!

You can also help us spread the word by forwarding this message, or posting the petition on social media. Here’s a simple message you can post:

Tell the US Congress to label GMOs by signing this petition. http://www.care2.com/gefood

If you want get informed, get active, and protect your family from GMOs, make sure you check out the Food Revolution Network’s complimentary No-GMO Action Pack.


Yours for safe and healthy food for all,
Ocean Robbins
Ocean Robbins

P.S. Get your No-GMO Action Pack here.

P.P.S. This week in the food revolution, we replay interviews on The Politics of Dinner: Food Policy for Healthy People, featuring interviews with Raj Patel, Michele Simon, and Congressman Dennis & Elizabeth Kucinich."

To learn more visit The Food Revolution website: http://www.foodrevolution.org/gmo.html

CHEMTRAILS AND THEIR PURPOSE



Project Cloverleaf – Chemtrails And Their Purpose
By Dutchsinse

It involves the combination of chemtrails for creating an atmosphere that will support electromagnetic waves, ground-based, electromagnetic field oscillators called gyrotrons, and ionospheric heaters.

Video Here http://goo.gl/VOf0H

Particulates make directed energy weapons work better. It has to do with “steady state” and particle density for plasma beam propagation. They spray barium powders and let it photo-ionize from the ultraviolet light of the sun. Then, they make an aluminum-plasma generated by “zapping” the metal cations that are in the spray with either electromagnetics from HAARP, the gyrotron system on the ground [Ground Wave Emergency Network], or space-based lasers. The barium makes the aluminum-plasma more particulate dense. This means they can make a denser plasma than they normally could from just ionizing the atmosphere or the air.

More density [more particles] means that these particles which are colliding into each other will become more charged because there are more of them present to collide. What are they ultimately trying to do up there — is create charged-particle, plasma beam weapons.

Chemtrails are the medium – GWEN pulse radars, the various HAARPs, and space-based lasers are the method, or more simply: Chemtrails are the medium — directed energy is the method. Spray and Zap.

This system appears to be in Russia, Canada, the United States, and all of Europe. Exotic weapons can be mobile, stationary, land-based, aerial, or satellite. It is an offensive and defensive system against EM attacks and missiles.

It uses ionospheric particle shells as defense mechanisms [like a bug-zapper shell]* against missiles and EM attacks. That means they spray and then pump up the spray with electromagnetics. When these shells are created using the oscillating, electromagnetic, gyrotron stations, it “excludes” and displaces the background magnetic field. These shells can be layered one above another in a canopy fashion for extra protection from missiles.

The chemtrail sprays have various elements in them like carbon which can used to absorb microwaves. Some of these sprays have metal flakes in them that make aerial craft invisible to radar. Spoofer sprays. Sprays like these can be used to create colorful, magnetized plasmas to cloak fighter jets. There are satellite weapons involved. Activists are using meters and are getting readings of microwaves, x-rays, and some other kind of emission that they are not sure of, maybe a low-intensity laser.

They are also photographing gas plasma generation due to the heating of chemtrails by electromagnetics. The technical names for vertical and horizontal plasma columns are columnar focal lenses and horizontal drift plasma antennas. Various size of gas plasma orbs are associated with this technology. These orbs can be used as transmitters and receivers because they have great, refractory and optical properties.

They also are capable of transmitting digital or analog sound. Barium, in fact, is very refractive — more refractive than glass. What does that mean? Our country has a history of experimenting on its citizens. We are talking about satellite charged-particle frequency weapons attacking a person 24 hours a day. Psychotronic weapons are considered weapons of mass destruction by the U.N.

HAARPs can create earthquakes and can also x-ray the earth to find underground military bases, gold, or oil reserves. These ionospheric heaters can also operate as an over-the-horizon or under-the-ocean communications system. This system can control the weather or create disasters.

Taken together with the aurora keyhole through-your-roof satellite surveillance system, Echelon electronic computer/phone sweeps, plasma-cloaked DOD Drug War helicopters and stealths, implants, and cameras on the street, it constitutes one, big global and space control grid. These weapons involve beams. Two beams overlapped will couple into a particle-ion beam that will bounce off of a remote target and send a holographic image back to the satellite for remote spying operations.

When you cross two strong beams, you can supposedly* create scalar energies.

These energies can be used as untraceable weapons for nuclear size explosions or for defense. These crossed-energies can be used to cause a person’s physical electrical system to fail or with a lower frequency, administer a kind of remote electro-shock. Visualize touching a positive and negative electric cable to each other on top of your head. Scalar energies can be utilized in hand-held military guns and on tanks. They can dud-out electronics or cause large, electrical blackouts. Scalar energies are practically impossible to shield against. You need lead, ceramics, and a deep underground facility to not be affected by these weapons. Or, you need to be up and above the field of battle.

http://usahitman.com/pccatp/

Original post: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=311368985643215&set=a.225932444186870.49466.225921714187943&type=1&theater

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

MALE FERTILITY UNDER THREAT AS AVERAGE SPERM COUNT DROPS


It appears that the New World Order Depopulation Agenda is working splendidly. GMO foods, vaccines, pesticides, and more, all serve to create infertility. The dark ones appear to be aiming specifically for the destruction of male fertility.

"A comprehensive study into the reproductive health of 26,600 men found sperm concentration has decreased by a third since the 1990s.

The findings are so significant experts have warned action must now be taken to avoid significant fertility problems and the average family size decreasing.

The study, which was carried out in France, found there had been a ''significant and continuous'' 32.2 per cent decrease in sperm concentration over 17 years.

Numbers of sperm per millilitre of semen fell at about two per cent a year between 1989 and 2005, with researchers calculating the average 35-year-old man would see his sperm count reduced from around 73.6 million per millilitre of semen to 49.9 million.

At the same time, the proportion of normally formed sperm declined by about a third.

Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the French authors said the study was the first to identify a long-term ''severe and general decrease'' in sperm concentration and quality at the scale of a whole country.

They added: ''This constitutes a serious public health warning. The link with the environment particularly needs to be determined.''

The scientists analysed data from semen samples collected from 126 fertility clinics throughout France.

All the couples involved were seeking treatment because of female problems rather than obvious difficulties linked to sperm.

Dr Joelle Le Moal, one of the researchers from the Institut de Veille Sanitaire in Saint Maurice, said: ''The decline in semen concentration shown in our study means that the average values we have for 2005 fall within the 'fertile' range for men according the definition of the World Health Organisation.

"However, this is just an average, and there were men in the study who fell beneath the WHO values.

''The 2005 values are lower than the 55 million per millilitre threshold, below which sperm concentration is expected to influence the time it takes to conceive.''

More promisingly, the study also showed the proportion of active or ''motile'' sperm rose slightly from 49.5 per cent to 53.6 per cent.

The findings support other research showing similar drops in sperm concentration and quality in recent years.

Some studies have suggested that environmental factors, such as endocrine disrupters - chemicals that upset hormone balances in the body - might be behind the trend.

Dr Le Moal said: ''Impairments in the quality of human gametes (male sperm and female eggs) can be considered as critical biomarkers of effects for environmental stresses, including endocrine disrupters. Firstly, this is because gametes are the very first cells from which human beings are built up during their lifetimes.

''According to the theories about the developmental origins of health and diseases, early exposures may have an impact on adult health.''

These effects can be passed down generations by the way they impact inherited DNA, she added.

A national monitoring system to assess French sperm quality is now being planned by the scientists.

Professor Richard Sharpe, from the University of Edinburgh, said: ''The take-home message from the study is extremely simple - sperm number and sperm quality has declined progressively over the study period.

''In the UK this issue has never been viewed as any sort of health priority, perhaps because of doubts as to whether 'falling sperm counts' was real. Now, there can be little doubt that it is real, so it is a time for action.

"Doing nothing will ensure that couple fertility and average family size will decline below even its present low level and place ever greater strains on society.''"

Source Article:
Male fertility under threat as average sperm counts drop
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9722963/Male-fertility-under-threat-as-average-sperm-counts-drop.html

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

CANCER CURING DR. BURZYNSKI CASE DISMISSED



Dr. Burzynski has been under attack by the medical profession for decades. They keep trying to find a way to put him out of business. But his treatments CURE CANCER, while they're so-called treatments are poisoning and killing people by the millions!

If you are diagnosed with cancer and have the financial resources to do so, I suggest seeking help from Dr. Burzynski and avoiding western medicine like the plague.
"After decades and many attempts to silence Dr. Burzynski and his cancer curing techniques, the Texas medical Board and the Western medical establishment are again forced to see their case thrown out.

Dead silence is all that remains, over a week since the Texas Medical Board was forced to drop their case against Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski. Other than a co

uple random small-town newspapers, a questionable blog and Saturday's opinion piece in a tiny Canadian regular, no one in the media has been willing to touch the news that, yet again, all charges were dismissed against a certain doctor that has literally and successfully cured cancer on many occasions.

The Texas Medical Board and the Western medical establishment had been targeting Dr. Burzynski for years and the media was fully willing to document the case against him and chastise his work, prior to the case being dismissed and despite his incredible success record. Strangely, as if the event never occurred, there's been nothing by the media since. A multi-billion dollar a year gravy-train is on the line and the establishment's puppet-media cannot allow everyone to catch on to the fact that many other forms of disease treatment exist and have typically proven to be far more effective than what is (allowed to be) prescribed by Western-trained medical practitioners.

Nonetheless, Dr. Burzynski is now free, again, to continue practicing the cancer-curing techniques that have been the reason for the target on his back since many in the public became aware of the alternative-minded doctor and his successful techniques. Adding to the staggering mountain of evidence in support of alternative and effective cancer treatments and, unfortunately, the medical establishment, their puppets and the ignorant and witting media that continue trying to silence them."

Source Article:
Cancer curing Dr. Burzynski case dismissed
http://www.examiner.com/article/dr-burzynski-free-to-continue-curing-cancer