Friday, June 29, 2012

WHY MEAT SHOULD BE OFF THE MENU


http://youtu.be/uQCe4qEexjc


Philip Wollen’s shakes the rafters of the auditorium with his 10-minute speech to the St James Ethics Centre and the Wheeler Centre debate in Australia on May 16, 2012. The larger debate consists of six speakers, three that make the case for getting animals off of the menu and three that make the case against it. Wollen is a former VP of Citibank and Australian philanthropist who is known to keep out of the limelight. But he sure rose to the challenge for this debate to deliver a huge performance and a powerful message. Bravo!

Join Philip Wollen and the Kindness Trust on their Facebook page. Watch the full debate with all six speakers.

This is the transcript to the speech:

On behalf of St James Ethics Centre, the Wheeler Centre,
The Melbourne Food and Wine Festival, The Age
The City of Melbourne and the ABC
All of whom have worked together to make this event possible
I would like to welcome
Philip Wollen

((Applause))

"King Lear, late at night on the cliffs asks the blind Earl of Gloucester “How do you see the world?”

And the blind man Gloucester replies “I see it feelingly”.

Shouldn’t we all?

Animals must be off the menu because tonight they are screaming in terror in the slaughterhouse, in crates, and cages. Vile ignoble gulags of despair.

I heard the screams of my dying father as his body was ravaged by the cancer that killed him. And I realised I had heard these screams before.

In the slaughterhouse, eyes stabbed out and tendons slashed, on the cattle ships to the Middle East and the dying mother whale as a Japanese harpoon explodes in her brain as she calls out to her calf.

Their cries were the cries of my father.

I discovered when we suffer, we suffer as equals.

And in their capacity to suffer, a dog is a pig is a bear. . . . . . is a boy.

Meat is the new asbestos – more murderous than tobacco.

CO2, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide from the livestock industry are killing our oceans with acidic, hypoxic Dead Zones.

90% of small fish are ground into pellets to feed livestock.

Vegetarian cows are now the world’s largest ocean predator.

The oceans are dying in our time. By 2048 all our fisheries will be dead. The lungs and the arteries of the earth.

Billions of bouncy little chicks are ground up alive simply because they are male.
Only 100 billion people have ever lived. 7 billion alive today. And we torture and kill 2 billion animals every week.

10,000 entire species are wiped out every year because of the actions of one species.
We are now facing the 6th mass extinction in cosmological history.

If any other organism did this a biologist would call it a virus.

It is a crime against humanity of unimaginable proportions.

The world has changed.

10 years ago Twitter was a bird sound, www was a stuck keyboard, Cloud was in the sky, 4 g was a parking place, Google was a baby burp, Skype was a typo and Al Kider was my plumber.

Victor Hugo said “there is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come”.

Animal Rights is now the greatest Social Justice issue since the abolition of slavery.

There are over 600 million vegetarians in the world.

That is bigger than the US, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Canada, Australia combined! If we were one nation we would be bigger than the 27 countries in the European Union!!

Despite this massive footprint, we are still drowned out by the raucous huntin’, shootin’, killin’ cartels who believe that violence is the answer – when it shouldn’t even be a question.

Meat is a killing industry – animals, us and our economies.

Medicare has already bankrupted the US. They will need $8 trillion invested in Treasury bills just to pay the interest. It has precisely zero!!

They could shut every school, army, navy, air force, and Marines, the FBI and CIA – and they still won’t be able to pay for it.

Cornell and Harvard say’s that the optimum amount of meat for a healthy diet is precisely ZERO.

Water is the new oil. Nations will soon be going to war for it.

Underground aquifers that took millions of years to fill are running dry.

It takes 50,000 litres of water to produce one kilo of beef.

1 billion people today are hungry. 20 million people will die from malnutrition. Cutting meat by only 10% will feed 100 million people. Eliminating meat will end starvation forever.

If everyone ate a Western diet, we would need 2 Planet Earths to feed them. We only have one. And she is dying.

Greenhouse gas from livestock is 50% more than transport . . . . . planes, trains, trucks, cars, and ships.

Poor countries sell their grain to the West while their own children starve in their arms. And we feed it to livestock. So we can eat a steak? Am I the only one who sees this as a crime? Every morsel of meat we eat is slapping the tear-stained face of a starving child. When I look into her eyes, should I be silent?

The earth can produce enough for everyone’s need. But not enough for everyone’s greed.

We are facing the perfect storm.

If any nation had developed weapons that could wreak such havoc on the planet, we would launch a pre-emptive military strike and bomb it into the Bronze Age.
But it is not a rogue state. It is an industry.

The good news is we don’t have to bomb it. We can just stop buying it.
George Bush was wrong. The Axis of Evil doesn’t run through Iraq, or Iran or North Korea. It runs through our dining tables. Weapons of Mass Destruction are our knives and forks.

This is the Swiss Army Knife of the future – it solves our environmental, water, health problems and ends cruelty forever.

The Stone Age didn’t end because we ran out of stones. This cruel industry will end because we run out of excuses.

Meat is like 1 and 2 cent coins. It costs more to make than it is worth.
And farmers are the ones with the most to gain. Farming won’t end. It would boom. Only the product line would change. Farmers would make so much money they wouldn’t even bother counting it.

Governments will love us. New industries would emerge and flourish. Health insurance premiums would plummet. Hospital waiting lists would disappear.

Hell “We’d be so healthy; we’d have to shoot someone just to start a cemetery!”
So tonight I have 2 Challenges for the opposition:

1. Meat causes a wide range of cancers and heart disease. Will they name one disease caused by a vegetarian diet?

2. I am funding the Earthlings trilogy. If the opposition is so sure of their ground, I challenge them to send the Earthlings DVD to all their colleagues and customers. Go on I DARE YOU.

Animals are not just other species. They are other nations. And we murder them at our peril.

The peace map is drawn on a menu. Peace is not just the absence of war. It is the presence of Justice.

Justice must be blind to race, colour, religion or species. If she is not blind, she will be a weapon of terror. And there is unimaginable terror in those ghastly Guantanamos.

If slaughterhouses had glass walls, we wouldn’t need this debate.
I believe another world is possible.

On a quiet night, I can hear her breathing.

Let’s get the animals off the menu and out of these torture chambers.

Please vote tonight for those who have no voice.

Thank you."
Philip Wollen, Australian Philanthropist, Former VP of Citibank, Makes Blazing Animal Rights Speech
http://freefromharm.org/videos/educational-inspiring-talks/philip-wollen-australian-philanthropist-former-vp-of-citibank-makes-blazing-animal-rights-speech/

EARLY HUMANS ATE ONLY FRUIT



From: Improving on Pritikin - You Can Do Better
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020149imp.on.pritikin/020149imp.on.pritikin.pdf



"EVOLUTIONARY EVIDENCE ON THE NATURAL DIET OF MAN

Using the electron microscope to reveal previously undetectable wear patterns on fossil teeth of pre-human and early human creatures and comparing these with wear patterns on teeth of other animals, scientists have produced evidence that our ancestral line evolved, anatomically and physiologically, on a diet composed primarily of fruit.

Because anatomically and physiologically the human body has not changed in all the millions of years that have passed since that stage of evolution, it is logical to assume such a diet to be best suited for us still today. That of course is the theme of this entire book, and the evidence from our remote past adds further to support
this theme.

Dr Alan Walker of Johns Hopkins University, Maryland is one researcher in this field with whom the author has conversed, having initially read the following report from The Health Crusader, July 1979. The report originated from an article in the New York Times, May 15, 1979:

"Dr Walker has come to the startling conclusion that early humans were fruit eaters — not just fruit eaters but exclusively and only fruit eaters — eaters of nothing but fruit. This comes as quite a bombshell from a noted publication that has a vested interest in a heavy meat-eating society. By careful examination of fossil teeth and fossilized remains of humans with the aid of electron microscopes and other sophisticated tools, Dr Walker and other researchers are absolutely certain that our ancestors, up to a point in relatively recent history, were fruitarians. Hygienists are not necessarily fruitarians but all will tell you that humans are, by physiology and anatomy, frugivores. A cursory study of biology will reveal this, even if written by meat-eating professors, which most of our biologists are.

The scope of the article is rather far flung. They trace humans through history as expanding to herbiage and nuts and, finally, to meat as a full-fledged omnivore.

But, the essence of the article is that, though we undertook omnivorous eating practices, our anatomy and physiology have not changed — we remain biologically a species of fruit eaters. Our dietetic character is established by our disposition toward fruits. Our natural diet has great eye and taste appeal. It passes from the stomach in digestible form in from 10 minutes to 30 minutes after ingestion.

Contrast this with concentrated fat and protein foods which take three to five hours to pass out of the stomach.

We do not have the four stomachs that herbivores usually have. This rules out most herbiage.

We have only one starch-splitting enzyme versus a multitude of them in omnivores and starch-eating animals. Our ptyalin is very limited. This rules us out as starch-eaters which includes grains or cereals. We are not graminivores. Neither are we carnivores. It is repugnant to our thoughts to kill and eat an animal while it is still warm and bloody, to eat its brains, heart, offal and blood as true carnivores do. True carnivores do not chew meat — they have in their digestive tracts a hydrochloric acid so concentrated, about 1100% more so than ours, that it will digest the flesh from our hands if they swallowed them. But our acids are so weak we digest meat poorly even if we chew it thoroughly. Even then we cannot handle uric acid except at great expense to our vitality and well-being. Cholesterol plays havoc with our circulatory system. So don't think we're natural meat-eaters. We're suffering
very dearly for our dietary indiscretions — America has more sick people than any country in the world.

Can you imagine the dismay with which our meat and dairy industry, not to mention our extensive junk food industry, will view such damaging propaganda? Can you not see how many advertisers will have second thoughts about placing advertising in the New York Times?

Well, it doesn't quite work like that. The junk food advertising in the New York Times amounts to about nil. It is a newspaper that 'prints all the news that's fit to print'. It serves a cultured aware audience.

But one of the surprising things that came out of this article is its attribution of the harmfulness of our shift from our natural diet of fruits to other items of food that range from eggs and insects to milk and meats, that range from roots to cereals."

A similar study by Associate Professor of Anthropology Frederick Grine, New York State University, and Professor of Anatomy Richard Kay, Duke University, North Carolina, comparing dental wear patterns of various animals with known diets to those of the earliest humans and apes indicated that humans ate soft fruits and leaves whereas their evolutionary cousins, the apes, included nuts and bark in their diets.

An article in the New England Journal of Medicine, January 31, 1985, called "Paleolithic Nutrition — A Consideration of Its Nature and Current Implications" by S. Boyd Eaton M.D. and Melvin Konner Ph.D, supported the evidence of the other scientists. The article described the progression of the early primate line from
insect-eaters (insectivores) to dependence on fruit and vegetables so that: "During the Miocene era (from about 24 to about 5 million years ago) fruits appear to have been the main dietary constituent for hominids, but their fossilized dental remains seem suitable for mastication of both animal and vegetable material." The six page article went on to discuss the deviations into meat-eating and so on since those remote times and had this to say about the diets of primitive populations today: Except for Eskimos and other high altitude peoples, hunter-gatherers typically use many species of wild plants for food. Roots, beans, nuts, tubers and fruits are the most common dietary constituents, but others, ranging from flowers to edible gums, are occasionally consumed. Small cereal grains, which have been staples for 'civilized' people since the Agricultural Revolution, make a surprisingly minor contribution overall." The article concluded: "The extent to which some of the major chronic diseases of industrialized society are related to the typical Western diet is controversial, but evidence for an important linkage is steadily accumulating. Medical researchers in diverse fields are beginning to define a generally preventive diet — one of benefit against conditions ranging from atherosclerosis to cancer. Such investigations are converging in several ways with the studies of paleontologists and anthropologists. Ultimately, of course, only experimental and clinical studies can confirm hypotheses about the medical consequences of dietary choices. Nevertheless, it is both intellectually satisfying and heuristically valuable to estimate the typical diet that human beings were adapted to consume during the long course of our evolution. Points of convergence between this estimate and modern recommendations are encouraging, and points of divergence suggest new lines of research. The diet of our remote ancestors may be a reference standard for modern human nutrition and a model for defense against certain 'diseases of civilization."

Thursday, June 21, 2012

DIABETES MEDICATION DURING PREGNANCY LINKED TO BLADDER CANCER, HEART PROBLEMS, IMPAIRED VISION AND MORE



Article by Alanna Ritchie
http://Drugwatch.com
"Diabetes Medication and Pregnancy

Around 150,000 women are diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) every year in the United States. More pregnancy complications result from GDM and type 2 diabetes than type 1 diabetes.

GDM occurs when glucose level rise during pregnancy and leads to complications that can include preeclampsia (high blood pressure), Cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, stillbirth, neonatal hypoglycemia and fetal macrosomia (big baby syndrome).
For women with GDM, as their pregnancy progresses, their glucose levels increase. Generally, following the birth of the child, the mother's glucose levels return to normal.

Some women with GDM are able to monitor blood sugar and make diet changes, but others require medication. According to the Diabetes Spectrum Journal, women with glucose levels greater than or equal to 120 mg/dl should use either insulin or oral medication.

Some doctors prescribe insulin, which may reduce the likelihood of fetal macrosomia. High infancy weight can mean more occurrences of type 2 diabetes, hypertension and obesity in adulthood.

Thus far, the American Diabetes Associations and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology do not endorse any oral agents for GDM. Insulin is the only treatment approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
However, oral agents are still commonly used.

The most recommended oral medication is glyburide, a sulfonylurea, because the positive outcomes are similar to that of insulin, and most studies show that the medicine cannot cross the placenta, keeping the baby safe.
Metformin, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone all cross the placenta, so they are not recommended.

However, a study from The New England Journal of Medicine found that metformin was not associated with perinatal complications and was preferred over insulin treatment.

Pioglitazone (Actos) should be approached with caution by everyone because of adverse side effects like weakened bones, impaired vision, heart problems and bladder cancer. Many users have filed an Actos lawsuit against the manufacturer of Actos after being diagnosed with bladder cancer.

In 2012, the National Cancer Institute estimates that nearly 15,000 Americans will die from bladder cancer. Actos and bladder cancer symptoms include back pain, blood in urine, pain while urinating and an increased need to urinate.


Eventually, more studies may show alternatives to insulin and the safe use of oral agents for GDM. Until then, oral agents can assist type 2 diabetes patients — which GDM mothers may become, as the diagnosis of GDM increases the likelihood of the mother developing type 2 diabetes during the 20 years following pregnancy."

Friday, June 15, 2012

MODERN-DAY VACCINES HAVE THEIR ROOTS IN NAZI MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS


"(NaturalNews) Most United States citizens would opt out of getting vaccines if they understood that natural foods, vitamins, herbs and supplements build up the immune system enough to fight off almost any disease known to mankind. For 70 plus years, the pharmaceutical industry (Big Pharma) has succeeded at its malicious money-making schemes, despite a well-documented history full of horrific lessons.

This is all documented in a groundbreaking downloadablePDF report published by NaturalNews:

http://www.naturalnews.com

In 2006, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) was signed into law by the Bush Administration, giving the U.S. Government the power to declare a "national emergency" for any infectious disease they claim is spreading and therefore require mandatory vaccinations for the entire population of the United States. In other words, U.S. citizens can now be denied their constitutional right of choice and be force-vaccinated or face jail time for being a "threat to national security," all without trial, and without any legal representation. (http://www.infowars.com)

Auschwitz, the largest German concentration camp of WWII, was the ideal "guinea pig" testing arena for dangerous pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines created by IG Farben (a very powerful cartel that consisted of German chemical and pharmaceutical companies such as BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst). Jewish prisoners of war would not be able to "sue" the government, so inhumane testing ensued. By vaccinating Jews, homosexuals, and anyone who denied the political views of the Nazi's (including children), Hitler was isolating his "master race" by sickening, weakening, or killing opposition, with a passive and silent terror campaign through vaccinations and nerve gas. (http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/economics/igfarben.html)

Nazi Germany wasn't a conspiracy theory, it was real, but people underestimated the movement as it rose up, and look what happened. Before and during the war, the Nazi's tested Jews the same way we test and breed animals (including the ones we eat) in the United States today. How are GMO (pesticide-laden) foods which cause cancer so different from pushing dangerous, chemical laden vaccines (like swine and flu shots) on humans? And how similar were the Nazi concentration camp conditions to the conditions we find many animals living in today - trapped in a horror story from birth to miserable death - also known as Concentrated (or Confined) Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs)?

There is a war going on today for chemical-free food and water, and a war for personal liberties that allow citizens the right tohave GMO foods labeled, and to opt out of vaccinations. It's been only 70 years since World War II, and the mad scientists didn't just go away, they went to work for corporations and pharmaceutical companies that run the vaccine and food industries now. Their heirs are continuing the "tradition" of making money by any means, with complete disregard for human sanctity.

Right now in the USA, poisonous foods and vaccines cross over moral and ethical barriers regarding basic humanity and the welfare of mankind. The United States has become a testing arena for Big Pharma's dangerous vaccines and pharmaceuticals. Ingredients in vaccines include toxins and carcinogens known to cause adverse reactions that are severe and sometimes fatal.

• Most vaccines go virtually untested and success rates are based strictly on results from testing animals in a laboratory.

• Many vaccines contain thimerosal, a preservative made with methyl mercury, which is extremely toxic to the central nervous system.

• Many vaccines contain chemical adjuvants, like squalene, which cause inflammation of the central nervous system.

• Autism is a neurological disorder. Vaccine ingredients break down peptides in the body which regulate the CNS, severely disrupting specific high cognitive functions and processes all characteristic of autism.

• Rates of autism have doubled in past decade.

• More than 1 in every 100 children in the U.S. are diagnosed with autism, which is the highest rate of any population in all of history.

• H1N1 vaccine greatly enhanced health risks for elderly, children, and those with heart disease, breathing issues and diabetes.

• The main group of scientists who convinced the World Health Organization to declare the H1N1 a "pandemic" had financial ties to the drug companies that profited.

• Australia banned flu vaccines in children after reports of seizures, and Finland banned H1N1 vaccines after linking them to narcolepsy in children.

• Injecting genetically modified bacteria and viruses runs the risk of causing a cytokine storm in the body, which is an exaggerated immune system response to a highly pathogenic invader. When a cytokine storm occurs in the lungs, fluids and immune cells accumulate and eventually block off the airways, often resulting in death.

For most of modern mankind, medical experiments are envisioned as happening in a laboratory environment with use of rats and mice, but modern Western medicine has devolved into a money making scheme which outsmarts the general public and uses them as the mice. Therefore, in the way that Hitler's evil pharmaceutical regime "flew under the radar" of so many powerful countries, so has allopathic medicine today.

Sources for this article include:

CLICK HERE FOR FREE DOWNLOAD: 25 Amazing (and Disturbing) Facts about the Hidden History of Medicine

Learn more about the true history of modern medicine in this revealing report. Free downloadable PDF. Covers Nazi connections with Big Pharma, war crimes of Bayer, the weapons origins of prescription medications, the shocking history of psychiatric medicine and much more.

Additional sources:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net

http://www.nachfolgeprozesse.nuernberg.de/english/trials/trials11.html

http://fcit.usf.edu/holocaust/resource/document/docmedex.htm

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

http://www.naturalnews.com/027175_autism_vaccines.html

http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/twoa.htm

http://www.naturalnews.com/030158_swine_flu_pandemic.html

http://www.wddty.com/autism-it-s-all-in-the-gut.html

http://www.tetrahedron.org

http://en.wikipedia.org

http://www.knowthelies.com/node/3944

http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=1490511"
Modern-day vaccines have their roots in Nazi medical experiments
http://www.naturalnews.com/036062_vaccines_Nazi_medical_experiments.html

BEFORE VACCINATING YOUR CHILDREN, DEMAND YOUR DOCTOR SIGN THIS FORM


"(NaturalNews) If you were to ask the average pediatrician practicing in America today what he or she thinks about childhood vaccinations, the likely response you would get would be that vaccines are safe and effective, and that their health benefits far outweigh any potential risks. But would these same pediatricians be willing to put their money where their mouth is by signing a warranty of vaccine safety, complete with documented, scientific evidence, that waives their legal immunity in the event of serious injury or death?

Building upon an earlier template originally developed by Ken Anderson from MakeMeYounger.com, PreventDisease.com has come up with an ingenious waiver form called the Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety that every parent needs to read and consider before even thinking about vaccinating a child. If vaccines are abundantly safe for young children, as we are all repeatedly told, then no doctor should have a problem signing a Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety declaring a number of things to be true, or not true, about vaccines.

Every doctor who pushes vaccines should already have a thorough knowledge of the toxic additives used in vaccines, the serious risks and side effects associated with receiving them, and how the long-term health of children may be permanently affected by the vaccine schedule. These and other details are clearly outlined in the Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety, of course, which essentially forces any signing doctor to acknowledge the truth about vaccines and take personal responsibility for their potential consequences.

In reality, though, many doctors are woefully unaware that some vaccines still contain mercury, for instance, or that others may contain live viruses that could cause cancer. Many are also unaware of the fact that modern vaccine theory and so-called "herd immunity" are two patently false ideas that represent nothing more than propaganda-based pseudoscience designed to scare the public, and future generations of medical students, into buying the vaccine myth without question.

This collective ignorance, coupled with a vehement pride that still pervades the medical profession, is the reason why most vaccine-pushing doctors, if not all, will likely refuse to sign this form waiving their legal immunity from vaccine lawsuits. But by asking them to do so, you will force them to acknowledge the facts, potentially reconsider their position on the matter, and at the very least provoke a renewed sense of critical thinking into so-called vaccine science.

You can read the entire Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety below, courtesy of PreventDisease.com (http://preventdisease.com), and print it off for your own personal use. You can also download a PDF copy of the Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety here:
http://preventdisease.com/pdf/Warranty-of-Vaccine-Safety-English.pdf


PHYSICIAN'S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY

I (Physician's name, degree) _______________ , _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________ . My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________ . My medical specialty is _______________ .

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient's name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolyzed gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient's name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as "fetuses").

In order to protect my patient's well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: __________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, -- "Physician's Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety." (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B, attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles in Support of Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety."

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C, attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician's Opinion of Vaccine Safety."

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D, attached hereto, -- "Physician's Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions."

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D, attached hereto, "Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors." I am issuing this Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient's name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________ , an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________ Date: ______________________"
Before vaccinating your children, demand your doctor sign this form
http://www.naturalnews.com/036006_vaccination_doctor_form.html

BABY MONKEYS GIVEN STANDARD DOSES OF POPULAR VACCINES DEVELOP AUTISM SYMPTOMS



Have you ever wondered just how many lives "science" has destroyed or how many animals they have tortured to uncover their "truths?"

Someday we will finally see that "science" and "medicine" are two of the darkest institutions on our planet.
"(NaturalNews) If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.

For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism.

Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.

Included in the mix were several vaccines containing the toxic additive Thimerosal, a mercury-based compound that has been phased out of some vaccines, but is still present in batch-size influenza vaccines and a few others. Also administered was the controversial measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which has been linked time and time again to causing autism and various other serious, and often irreversible, health problems in children (http://www.greenhealthwatch.com)

"This research underscores the critical need for more investigation into immunizations, mercury, and the alterations seen in autistic children," said Lyn Redwood, director of SafeMinds, a public safety group working to expose the truth about vaccines and autism. "SafeMinds calls for large scale, unbiased studies that look at autism medical conditions and the effects of vaccines given as a regimen."

Vaccine oversight needs to be taken from CDC and given to independent agency, says vaccine safety advocate

Adding to the sentiment, Theresa Wrangham, president of SafeMinds called out the CDC for failing to require proper safety studies of its recommended vaccination schedules. Unlike all other drugs, which must at least undergo a basic round of safety testing prior to approval and recommendation, vaccinations and vaccine schedules in particular do not have to be proven safe or effective before hitting the market.

"The full implications of this primate study await publication of the research in a scientific journal," said Wrangham. "But we can say that it demonstrates how the CDC evaded their responsibility to investigate vaccine safety questions. Vaccine safety oversight should be removed from the CDC and given to an independent agency."

Be sure to read this thorough analysis of the study by Catherine J. Frompovich of VacTruth.com:

http://vactruth.com/2012/04/29/monkeys-get-autism/

Sources for this article include:

http://vran.org


http://www.safeminds.org/
"
Vaccine bombshell: Baby monkeys given standard doses of popular vaccines develop autism symptoms
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html

UNVACCINATED CHILDREN LESS LIKELY TO HAVE ASTHMA OR ALLERGIES


"(Health Secrets Newsletter) It is commonly assumed that vaccinations are responsible for bringing about substantial improvements in public health, and that humans were much more prone to developing serious disease prior to their advent. But a new survey released by VaccineInjury.info debunks this myth by showing that unvaccinated children are far less prone to developing allergies, autoimmune disorders, neurological problems, endocrine diseases, and other illnesses compared to their vaccinated counterparts.

German homeopathic practitioner Andreas Bachmair compiled health data on more than 8,000 unvaccinated children from at least 15 different countries, and compared it to health data compiled on more than 17,400 vaccinated children involved in a German study known as KiGGS - The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents.

The children involved in both studies ranged in age from 0 - 17, but most of the children involved in the unvaccinated study were eight years of age or younger. Both studies, however, used the same criteria for collecting data on children's health, and both are considered to have arrived at valid results.

In every single health category evaluated as part of both studies, the overall health of unvaccinated children was leaps and bounds ahead of the vaccinated children. The allergy rate among vaccinated children, for instance, was more than double the allergy rate among unvaccinated children. And worse, vaccinated children were found to be nearly eight times more prone to developing asthma or chronic Bronchitis than were unvaccinated children.

Another significant difference between the two groups was observed in the category of autoimmune disorders. While less than half of one percent of unvaccinated children were found to have developed an autoimmune disease, roughly seven percent of vaccinated children developed one -- and according to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), nearly 25 percent of Americans today suffer from at least one autoimmune disorder.

The other health categories where unvaccinated children fared better than vaccinated children included neurodermatitis, herpes, otitis media (ear infections), hay fever, hyperactivity, scoliosis, epilepsy and seizures, migraine headaches, and thyroid disease. The only category where disease rates were roughly equal between the two groups was in the category of diabetes mellitus, a disease which affects only about 0.2% of children under the age of 20,.

You can view the entire Bachmair vaccination study, complete with thorough details and visual graphs, by visiting:
http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccinations-in-general/health-unvaccinated-children/survey-results-illnesses.html


About The Author:

Ethan Huff is a freelance writer and health enthusiast who runs www.thedailyportion.com. He is also a Staff Writer for NaturalNews.com, the popular natural health website."

Unvaccinated Children Less Likely to have Asthma or Allergies
http://www.alignlife.com/articles/asthma/Unvaccinated_Children_Less_Likely_to_have_Asthma_or_Allergies.html

Saturday, June 9, 2012

U.S. HAS HIGHEST RATE OF PRETERM BIRTHS IN THE DEVELOPED WORLD

In the U.S., 12% of babies are born prematurely and then kept isolated in incubators, far from human love. These tiny little babies receive little or no loving touch and parents are often prohibited from stroking and/or caressing their own children. Instead, these poor babies receive touch only in the form of painful protocols that are inflicted on them day after day after day in neonatal intensive care units.



One man, Dr. Nils Bergman, has been busy creating an alternative protocol to support premature babies. This protocol is called "kangaroo mother care" and involves keeping the infant skin-to-skin with its mother round the clock beginning immediately at birth.



Although the answer is obvious, scientists and doctors seem to think they need to do "research" in order to discover whether kangaroo mother care will is better psychologically and physically for a child, and whether it will enhance the mother-child bond. DUH!!!

And by the way, dads are involved in kangaroo care too.


"A new report from the World Health Organization looking at global rates of preterm births contains some surprising findings. Most European nations, along with Canada and Australia experience preterm births at a rate of about 7-9%. In the US, however, 1 in 9 children is born early – that’s 12% of total births.

The other countries in the 12% bracket? Kenya, Turkey, Thailand, East Timor, and Honduras. Countries with higher rates include part of Africa, Indonesia, and Pakistan. Why would preterm births be so high in the US compared to nations with a similar standard of living? Debates about women’s health care and access to insurance aside, surely health care in the US is a little more advanced than Honduras?

The WHO’s findings are interesting. While in other nations, these high rates of preterm birth can be attributed to untreated infections and girls experiencing more pregnancies from a young age. And, in these nations, only 10% of premature infants are expected to live.

The US stats tell a different story. For one, premature infants born in America have a 90% chance to survival due to the availability of antibiotics, steroids, and other medications to fight common complications. Still, preterm births are a major contributing factor to the high infant mortality rate in the US, and many of these children experience disabilities or continuing illness even if they do survive.

Doctors don’t completely understand the triggers for preterm birth, but they have a few ideas. America has a higher rate of teen pregnancy than other nations, as well as high numbers of women over 35 attempting to give birth. Fertility treatments can make it more likely that a mother will have twins or triplets, which are often delivered early via Cesarean section to avoid the risks of multiple vaginal deliveries.

The rate of obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, smoking, and other risk factors may also help explain the numbers. Pregnant women without health insurance may not see doctors when they get sick, raising the risk of going into labor early.

Two other studies, by Dr. Radek K. Bukoski and Dr. Gordon C. S. Smith, suggest that these explanations may not show the full picture. Dr. Bukoski looked at Mexican-American immigrants and found that their risk of preterm birth increased dramatically the longer they lived in America – only 4% for recent immigrants, compared to 10% in those who had gained citizenship. The study controlled for risk factors including age, poverty, smoking habits, obesity, and diabetes. Dr. Smith’s research comparing preterm birth rates in the UK and America found that even in areas with similar risk factors, the rates were still lower. This is clearly going to have to be an area of continuing research."
The full WHO study can be read on online for free.


US Has Highest Rate of Preterm Births in the Developed World
http://www.care2.com/causes/us-has-highest-rate-of-preterm-births-in-the-developed-world.html

SWADDLING CAUSES HIGH STRESS RESPONSE IN INFANTS



Yesterday, I spent the day in the presence of @Nils Bergman, who is the founder of Kangaroo Mother Care in South Africa. Nils confirmed that swaddling causes high levels of cortisol in infants
and that infants are actually having an extreme stress response which involves shutting down and/or disassociation when they are swaddled. Infants are not "sleeping" when they are swaddled, but are in an extreme biological shutdown which would only happen in case of extreme threat. In other words, if the infant were in the wild and was in extreme danger of being eaten by a wild animal, it would "play dead" and remain very silent so as not to be noticed. Infants are responding the same exact way when they are swaddled and are really in a state of hypervigilance to threat and exhibiting signs of parasympathetic shock.

Swaddling is NOT good. And a better and far more loving way to calm a baby would be to put the baby skin-to-skin with it's mother.
"...In fact, many researchers and infant advocates now believe the apparent contentment of a swaddled baby may in fact be a sign of listlessness and shutting down, rather than of feeling comforted. Franz tells of a new product introduced some years ago at a medical conference. Plugged into a crib, the device vibrated its springs while emitting “white noise.” Fussy babies were believed to be calmed by the rhythmic movement and sounds. But photographs of the babies’ faces told another story.

“In the before photos the eyes were open, hands fisted, there was tightness around the nose and mouth, and the babies were crying,” Franz says. In photos taken as babies experienced the crib device, the hands were still fisted, there was the same furrowed brow and tightness around the eyes and mouth—but the babies were silent. Franz has observed a similar response among swaddled babies. “The baby is staying quiet but is not relaxed or happy. That led me to conclude the baby is shutting down,” she says..."
The Question of Routine Swaddling
http://mothering.com/parenting/the-question-of-routine-swaddling