Thursday, June 30, 2011

MORE ON OBSTETRICAL ABUSE OF MOTHERS - NURSES TELL THE STORY



My friends - this is almost too much to conceive of, and yet is happening all over the United States. As I sit down to write this blog, my sister and friend, Janel Mirendah, tells me that her ex-husband, too, was ordered to hold a mother down while the other doctor began a C-section before the anesthesia having taken effect.

Ritual torture is the name of the game.

“We were called to a ‘stat’ c-section the other night for ‘severe fetal distress’ and the OB’s started cutting this woman before the anesthesia was effective…and they did the old pull and tear maneuver while she could still feel it also. (It was in the same OR as I was in to have Alexandra.) I started sweating and got really anxious, scared, and thought I was going to throw-up and faint at the same time. But then I said, ‘OK PEOPLE YOU HAVE TO STOP!! THIS MOM IS SCREAMING AT THE TOP OF HER LUNGS!!!’ They did stop and then gave her a general… but I felt terrorized all over again… and that poor mother!!”
http://www.glorialemay.com/blog/?p=98

TECHNOLOGICAL BIRTH = ABUSE OF WOMEN, INFANTS, AND FAMILIES AND A "SYSTEMIC VIOLATION OF WOMEN'S RIGHTS"



WARNING - GRAPHIC IMAGES OF STANDARD HOSPITAL BIRTH PROTOCOLS ARE CONTAINED IN THIS POST. SOME OF THESE IMAGES MAY BE PERCEIVED AS THE RITUAL TORTURE AND ABUSE OF INFANTS AND MOTHERS. THOSE WITH WEAK CONSTITUTIONS MAY NOT WANT TO VIEW THESE IMAGES.

"Amnesty [International] details the maternal-health care crisis in [the U.S.] as part of a systemic violation of women's rights. The report, titled "Deadly Delivery," notes that the likelihood of a woman's dying in childbirth in the U.S. is five times as great as in Greece, four times as great as in Germany and three times as great as in Spain... In the U.S., we spend more than any country on health care, yet American women are at greater risk of dying from pregnancy-related causes than in 40 other countries..."
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1971633,00.html


AWAKEN MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS! IT IS TIME TO SNAP OUT OF THE TRANCE! TECHNOLOGICAL BIRTH IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST THREATS TO THE WELL-BEING OF OUR BABIES, OUR FAMILIES, AND OUR SPECIES. IT IS IMPERATIVE FOR US TO TAKE BIRTH OUT OF THE HOSPITALS AND BACK INTO THE HOME WHERE IT BELONGS. THIS IS AN URGENT CALL TO ALL FUTURE PARENTS TO PROTECT YOURSELF, YOUR BABY, AND YOUR FAMILY FROM THE RITUAL ABUSE AND TRAUMA OF HOSPITAL BIRTH!


ONE PICTURE SPEAKS A THOUSANDS WORDS...
A PICTORIAL DISPLAY OF TECHNOLOGICAL BIRTH

(My thanks to Patti Ramos for several of these images
http://www.doulapattiramos.com )


THE RITUAL OF CAUSING PAIN AND TERROR IN BIRTHING MOTHERS



THE RITUAL OF EPIDURAL RENDERING US UNABLE TO FEEL OUR BODIES, OUR BABIES, AND OUR POWER



THE RITUAL OF FETAL HEART MONITORS THAT ARE SCREWED INTO OUR BABIES HEADS!!!



THE RITUAL OF EPISIOTOMY AND THE SEXUAL VIOLATION OF MOTHERS



THE BRUTAL HANDLING OF INFANTS



MORE BRUTAL HANDLING OF INFANTS



THE RITUAL OF SEPARATING MOTHER AND BABY AT BIRTH



THE RITUAL OF C-SECTION CAUSING GRIEF IN MOTHER AND CHILD



THE REALITIES OF A C-SECTIONED WOMB




THE REALITIES OF A BABY BEING VIOLENTLY PULLED OUT OF THE WOMB



MORE ON THE REALITIES OF A BABY BEING VIOLENTLY FORCED OUT OF THE WOMB



THE RITUAL TORTURE OF INFANTS IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS



MORE RITUAL TORTURE OF INFANTS IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS



THE RITUAL SEXUAL TORTURE AND ABUSE OF INFANTS THROUGH CIRCUMCISION



MORE RITUAL SEXUAL TORTURE AND ABUSE OF INFANTS THROUGH CIRCUMCISION



MORE RITUAL TORTURE OF INFANTS


IT IS TIME TO SNAP OUT OF THE TRANCE.

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

AVOID UNNECESSARY MEDICAL INTERVENTION DURING PREGNANCY AND BIRTH


BIRTH WAS NEVER INTENDED TO BE A TECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURE. MEDICAL INTERFERENCE IS HARMING OUR CHILDREN, OUR FAMILIES, AND OUR SPECIES!

"Babies whose mothers are induced before the baby is 39 weeks have a higher likelihood of death, being admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), feeding disorders, and life-long health problems, according to the journal. You can protect yourself and your baby by not scheduling a delivery before 39 weeks without a sound medical reason and researching hospitals’ early induction rates."

http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=afterminal&L=4&L0=Home&L1=Insurance+%26+Retirement&L2=Manage+Your+Health&L3=Patient+Safety+and+Medical+Mistakes&sid=Eoaf&b=terminalcontent&f=gic_healtharticles_early_induction_caesarean&csid=Eoaf

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

ARE CHEMTRAILS A PROBLEM IN YOUR AREA? USE ORGNOITE TO DISSOLVE THEM!

If chemtrails are a problem in your area, try using orgonite. It definitely works to dissolve and neutralize the toxins.

MONSANTO'S "ROUND-UP" CAUSING BIRTH DEFECTS


This evil company has cursed millions of human and animal families and committed crimes against humanity, the Earth, and all it's inhabitants. It is time to send the curses back to their maker:

"While Roundup has been associated with deformities in a host of laboratory animals, its impact on humans remains unclear. One laboratory study done in France in 2005 found that Roundup and glyphosate caused the death of human placental cells. Another study, conducted in 2009, found that Roundup caused total cell death in human umbilical, embryonic and placental cells within 24 hours. Yet researchers have conducted few follow-up studies."

Roundup: Birth Defects Caused By World's Top-Selling Weedkiller, Scientists Say
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/24/roundup-scientists-birth-defects_n_883578.html?ref=fb&src=sp

REMEMBERING INFANTS WHO HAVE DIED AND THEIR FAMILIES



♥ As June is dedicated to SANDS (Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Support) Awareness Month we remember all babies born sleeping, or whom we've carried but never met, those we've held but couldn't take home, or the ones that came home but didn't stay. Please pass this on if you or someone you know has suffered the loss of a baby. ♥

And let's send out prayers to this family, who just lost their baby at birth in Montreal, Canada. When the police get involved, the situation is even harder.


Death of newborn at Pointe Claire birthing centre prompts three investigations:
http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/Death+newborn+Pointe+Claire+birthing+centre+prompts+three+investigations/5013908/story.html

Thursday, June 23, 2011

EUGENICS - THE DARK SIDE OF SCIENCE AND THE AGENDA TO CREATE A 'MASTER' RACE




North Carolina hearing explores history of forced sterilization: http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/06/22/raleigh.eugenics.hearing/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

"A social worker convinced my mom to sign for me to undergo an operation that would prevent me from getting pregnant, not knowing all the while that I was being set up to be sterilized like I was some kind of animal."

EUGENICS - Eu 'good + genos' - from the Greek work "eugenes' meaning 'well-born, of good stock;' the process of selectively breeding humans and animals to rid the population of "unfit" characteristics.

The nazis were big fans of eugenics. Planned Parenthood, too, was founded by a well-known racist and eugenics supporter (Margaret Sanger) and is now responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of unborn fetuses annually.

Heck, even well-known and well-organized spiritual communities, such as the one in existence today at Damanhur, Italy, are engaged in the study and practice of this very dark science.

So the question remains - how deep does this rabbit hole really go?


To learn more about the dark history of Planned Parenthood, please follow this link: How Planned Parenthood Duped America: The Truth About Margaret Sanger -
http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html


To learn more about the dark side of Damanhur, please visit;
http://damanhurinsideout.wordpress.com/
OR
http://damanhurinsideout.wordpress.com/the-other-face-of-damanhur/chapter-1-black-magic/


And in the words of Farfalla Vitalba, midwife at Damanhur and organizer of the 2010 World Birth Summit: "At Damanhur, for more than thirty years, we have researched the concept of “programming” childbirth, spiritual eugenics, [and] developing characteristics of the new individual..."

Monday, June 20, 2011

THOUSANDS MORE WOMEN IN THE U.S. ARE CHOOSING HOMEBIRTH

YAY! "More women in the United States are choosing to give birth at home in recent years. After decades of decline, a new study found home births increased by 20 percent between 2004 and 2008..."



And to think that just 100 years ago "almost all births took place at home." Yet, by 1969, less than 1% of babies were born at home. WOW!!! How did so many American women ever come to believe that birthing their babies in a technological, trauma-filled, disease-ridden environment would be good for them? Talk about effective propoganda!!! Thank goodness many of us are coming to our senses.



http://www.nwitimes.com/niche/get-healthy/health-care/article_0dab2c6e-67ea-5653-ad62-f9384a77f13d.html

Friday, June 17, 2011

VACCINES BEING USED TO MODIFY HUMAN BEHAVIOR

VACCINES ARE BEING USED TO GENETICALLY ALTER HUMAN BEINGS. IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE THIS, PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO AND SEE FOR YOURSELF. Here you will see pentagon personnel presenting their intention to use a vaccine for the express purpose of altering genes that might otherwise express themselves in "undesirable" human behavior (in this case, the undesirable behavior is "fanatical" religiosity).

But the rabbit hole goes even deeper than that. In his latest book "Human Race, Get Off Your Knees," David Icke has suggested that vaccines are also being used as a means to inject microchips into human beings. Swine flu vaccine is a major player on this front.

Microchips are used as a form of mind-control -- to control human behavior.

It's a very dark world my friends. Science and government are showing themselves to absolutely be devoid of love -- i.e., EVIL!






http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MuXgpl2Sxg&feature=youtu.be

Thursday, June 16, 2011

AUSTRALIAN MUMS PUSHED INTO CESAREAN BIRTHS

"SOME of the state's biggest private hospitals are performing cesareans on more than half the women giving birth in their maternity wards, new figures reveal...

"Caesarean births are recommended as safer options for women
















(pic by Doula Patti Ramos - Patti Ramos Photography)


"Several new mothers approached by The Sunday Mail last week said they had been pushed into having caesareans by private hospital obstetricians after initially wanting to give birth naturally.

One Coolum mum, 45, said her obstetrician told her she had "no choice" because the baby would "not fit through my birthing canal".

"I have since been told I should have been offered a physio consultation because a physio could have said if it could be adjusted," she said.

"I just wanted a natural birth, to me that was important. Even if I had been allowed to start labour rather than being told, 'You're booked in and this is the way it is'."Another mum, 26, desperate to avoid a caesarean, said her obstetrician also tried to book an induction because she had passed her due date in the Christmas-New Year period. 'The obstetrician said we can book you in for an induction because we just don't like calling people in on public holidays,' she said."

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/sunday-mail/mums-to-be-pushed-into-caesareans-as-hospital-rates-soar/story-e6frep2f-1226073562079

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

LOOK UP!!! WANNA KNOW WHAT'S IN THOSE TOXIC AND ABSURD LOOKING "CLOUDS" IN YOUR SKY?








Here you go:

Via Kimberly Usher: "Here is a list I received from a friend of mine who still works for DoD, were I used to work, what has being sprayed on us on a daily basis since '89, the elements in the aerial sprayings also known as chemtrails and these are the contends ...what's in the aerial spraying conducted in all 50 states and in the NATO countries by the way,

Aluminum Oxide Particles, Arsenic, Bacilli and Molds, Barium Salts, Barium Titanates, Cadmium, Calcium, Chromium, Desiccated Human Red Blood Cells, Ethylene Dibromide, Enterobacter Cloacal, Enterobacteriaceae, Human white Blood Cells-A (restrictor enzyme used in research labs to snip and combine DNA), Lead, Mercury, Methyl Aluminum, Mold Spores, Mycoplasma, Nano-Aluminum-Coated Fiberglass, Nitrogen Trifluoride, Known as CHAFF), Nickel, Polymer Fibers, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Florescens, Radioactive Cesium, Radio Active Thorium, Selenium, Serratia Marcscens, Sharp Titanium Shards, Silver, Streptomyces, Stronthium, Sub-Micron Particles(Containing Live Biological Matter), Unidentified Bacteria, Uranium, and Yellow Fungal Mycotoxins."

Isn't that special?

‎"Now that we have tied together the historical and political realities for which we mindlessly wave our flags, we still hope that sufficient numbers of American lab rats will miraculously awaken from their collective stupor and take stock ...of our appalling situation. After all, rodents have a notoriously short life span and are always...... killed when no longer useful to those conducting research. The irony of this horror story is that we rats are being plundered to finance our own demise. Our national debt of 7.2 trillion grows by $1.8 billion a day.90 The Pentagon cannot account for $2.3 trillion of its shadowy transactions.91 The radioactive operations in Iraq are costing $3.7 billion a month, those in Afghanistan $900 million a month.92 No one knows how many $billions are being flushed into Operation Cloverleaf and other hobgoblin projects. The U.S. spends $11,000 per second on weapons, according to calculations of celebrated author William Thomas.93

So, while we await the great awakening, have a wonderful, barium-dried summer under a synthetic tarpaulin of aluminum-white, particle-laden, electrically-charged aviation scum that passes for sky. Endure well your respiratory and ocular difficulties while staring at huge oily sun rings and smeary sundogs, the patent signature of chemical assault. Don't forget to salute and click your heels when you see tanker formations patriotically saturating the atmosphere with such a dense, micro-particulate brew that they cast black shadows alongside or ahead of themselves.

As you witness the noxious drama in the skies, remember, it's all just part of the "kill chain.""

http://chemtrailsaustralia.blogspot.com/

THEY CALL THIS "NORMAL BIRTH?" THIS IS RAPE!

OMG!! This is so violent. You wanna talk about oral rape? Here you have it folks. Unfucking believable!!! And you can easily see at the very beginning why people are perceiving these entities as "aliens" and having dreams about being abducted. Look at the mask across the nurses face at the very beginning. There is nothing human or humane about this type of birth. I only see violation and abuse.


http://youtu.be/Jwo0I-kA1HA

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

DOES YOUR CHILD HAVE FOOD ALLERGIES? PLEASE WATCH THIS!!!

"Scientists engineered insecticide into the DNA of a corn seed, so that as the corn grows, it releases it's own insecticide. As a result, corn was then regulated by the EPA as an insecticide." Children who consume this GMO corn, then have insecticide release into their bloodstreams and digestive systems.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rixyrCNVVGA&feature=player_embedded


TERMINAL CANCERS EASILY CURED - FDA TRIES TO PREVENT THE CURE FROM REACHING THE PUBLIC

PLEASE WATCH! This is an incredibly important video about how to EASILY CURE CANCER. The film takes a criticial look at the death-wielding, money-making, medical machine, how it is poisoning our species through radiation and chemotherapy, and how we can take our power back. FREE for a limited time only (until June 20th).


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/06/11/burzynski-the-movie.aspx





MITOTANE CHEMOTHERAPY - Derived from DDT Pesticide/Insecticide.

ETOPOSIDE CHEMOTHERAPY - Side Effects - Leukemia, Nerve Damage, Inability to fight Infections, Vomiting

DOXORUBICAN CHEMOTHERAPY - Side Effects - Leukemia, Heart Failure, Infertility, Vomiting, Mouth Sores, Nickname - RED DEATH

CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY - Side Effects - Kidney Damage, Hearing Damage, Nerve Damage, Infertility, Vomiting



Dr. Mercola's comments:

Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski was born in the early 1940's in Poland, and was trained as both a biochemist and a physician. He's spent the last 35 years developing and successfully treating cancer patients suffering with some of the most lethal forms of cancer at his clinic in Houston, Texas.

I recently interviewed Dr. Burzynski about his cancer treatment—a gene-targeted approach using non-toxic peptides and amino acids, known as antineoplastons. Here, I will follow up with a review of his recently released documentary, Burzynski, The Movie.

It's an absolute jaw-dropper...

For anyone who has ever been affected by cancer, either directly or indirectly, the facts presented in this film will hit you like a rude slap in the face.

You will learn that not only did the US Federal government spend 14 years actively suppressing a cancer treatment that had a FAR greater success rate than any other treatment available, they also spent well over $60 million of US taxpayer dollars trying to put the inventor of the treatment in jail in order to steal his patents and either suppress or cash in on his discovery.

This film is an absolute MUST-SEE, as the summary I'm about to present below simply cannot do it justice. It's available for purchase at BurzynkiMovie.com, where you can view the first half-hour for free. The site also contains a large number of video clips, as well as a full transcript of the entire film, along with links to all the documentation presented.

What's so Special about Dr. Burzynski's Treatment?

The story begins back in the early 1970's when Dr. Burzynski discovered that people with cancer lacked a certain peptide, while those who were cancer free had a plentiful supply of it.

This finding eventually led him to create a medical treatment referred to as antineoplastons. The drug contains a mixture of peptides and derivatives of amino acids. These were known to act as molecular switches, but as genome research blossomed and science progressed, Dr. Burzynski discovered they also work as genetic switches, and that is why antineoplastons work so well. They're actually able to turn on cancer suppressing genes, while simultaneously turning oncogenes (cancer genes) off.

As explained in the film:

"Our bodies contain two categories of genes that allow cancer to flourish: oncogenes, and tumor suppressor genes. When someone has cancer, they have a higher level of oncogenes switched on, with a higher level tumor suppressor genes switched off.

The goal is to tell the body to both switch back on the tumor suppressor genes, and turn off as many oncogenes as possible."

While other gene targeting cancer drugs now exist, they're only capable of targeting a small number of specific cancer genes. Antineoplastons, on the other hand, targets a wide spectrum of cancer genes—about 100 of them at once. In a very simplistic way, antineoplastons are to cancer what a broad-spectrum antibiotic is to infectious disease.

Success Rates of Chemo and Radiation versus Antineoplastons

The film features several remarkable case stories of people who were successfully cured of cancer, but it's when the clinical trial data of conventional therapies versus antineoplastons are stacked against each other that the benefits of antineoplastons become really obvious:

Radiation or Chemotherapy Only Antineoplastons Only
5 of 54 patients (9 percent)
were cancer free at the end of treatment 5 of 20 (25 percent)
were cancer free at the end of treatment
Toxic side effects No toxic side effects
Tackling Childhood Brain Tumors

Dr. Burzynski was so confident in his antineoplastons that he even accepted the most difficult and "hopeless" cases, such as childhood brain tumors. Conventional medicine has little or nothing to offer in these cases, and the side effects can be as horrific as the disease itself, if not more. Furthermore, the best outcome conventional treatment can offer is to slow down the growth of the tumor.

Using antineoplastons, however, Dr. Burzynski has been able to successfully cure many of these otherwise hopeless cases, such as Jessica Ressel.

She was 11 years old when she was diagnosed with brainstem glioma—an incurable brain tumor. After learning that she would die no matter what toxic drugs and radiation treatments she underwent, the family decided to not put her through it. When they found Dr. Burzynski, they literally had nothing to lose...

Twelve months later—after having initially been told she had but a few months to live, and given no chance of survival at all—MRI's confirmed she was cancer-free. Her brain tumor was completely resolved. Today, Jessica is a healthy 24-year old woman, pregnant with her second child.

When comparing FDA-supervised studies of treatments for lethal childhood brainstem gliomas, antineoplastons again comes out as a clear winner:

Chemotherapy Only Antineoplastons Only
1 of 107 patients (0.9 percent)
were cancer free at end of treatment 11 of 40 patients (27.5 percent)
were cancer free at end of treatment
0 of 107 patients (0 percent)
survived past five years 11 of 40 patients (27.5 percent)
survived past five years

Even more interesting, while some of Dr. Burzynski's patients did eventually die after the five-year mark, most who did NOT undergo chemotherapy prior to getting antineoplastons have gone on to live normal, healthy lives—yet another indication that in many cases, the conventional treatments are more lethal than the disease itself.

Side Effects of Chemotherapy Drugs

Here's just a sampling of the side effects of three conventional chemotherapy drugs:

* Doxorubicin (nick-name: Red Death)—leukemia, heart failure, infertility, mouth sores
* Etoposide—leukemia, nerve damage, inability to fight infections
* Cisplatin—kidney damage, hearing damage, nerve damage, infertility

Another chemo drug, Mitotane, which is derived from DDT, is also used for pediatric patients even though no studies have ever been performed to ascertain its safety or effectiveness in children.

Dr. Burzynski's Troubles Begins...

The legal battle Dr. Burzynski found himself embroiled in over his invention is convoluted to say the least. There are many bizarre twists and turns, and I strongly urge you to watch the documentary to fully appreciate what happened.

Dr. Burzynski had tried to get the FDA to review and approve antineoplastons since 1977, to no avail. To make sure he would not get into trouble for using the experimental therapy in his practice, his legal team reviewed federal and Texas state laws, confirming that he was acting within the laws and could use antineoplastons in his own practice "to meet the immediate needs of patients," since he was a licensed physician. Particularly if no other alternatives were available to the patient. He could not engage in interstate commerce, however, so he had to restrict the use of the drug to his home state of Texas.

But word spread, and patients started traveling to his office from out of state.

Suddenly, in 1984, he found out that agents from the Texas board of medical examiners were traveling to patients across the country trying to convince them to file charges against him.

What followed next truly challenges the rational mind.

Texas Board of Medical Examiners Try to Strip Away his Medical License

In 1988, despite not breaking any laws, and having produced more evidence than was required to show that his treatment was effective and that no harm was coming to his patients from it, the Texas medical board charged him with breaking a law that didn't exist, claiming it was grounds for revoking his medical license.

They didn't have a case, but kept the charges going by continuing to file slightly amended complaints, until finally, in 1993, the case went to trial. By then, 60 of Dr. Burzynski's patients had filed a petition for the medical board to stop harassing their doctor—a petition that the board successfully eliminated from the trial by filing a motion to strike it from the record.

Testifying on Dr. Burzynski's behalf, however, was a leading expert from none other than the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Dr. Nicholas Patronas, MD, a board certified radiologist since 1973, and the founder and chief of Neurology at the NCI. Even he recognized the absurdity of the board's case, and put his own career on the line to testify.

The judge ruled in Dr. Burzynski's favor, confirming that no laws had been broken.

You'd think that would be the end of it. But not so in this case. Instead of accepting defeat, the Texas medical board filed charges against Dr. Burzynski with the Texas Supreme Court.

The Method Behind the FDA's Madness

It eventually came to light that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had pressured the Texas medical board to revoke Dr. Burzynski's medical license—despite the fact that no laws were broken, and his treatment was proven safe and effective.

But WHY?

It's been stated many times that a crime can be solved simply by following the money, and this case is no exception. The FDA and the pharmaceutical industry had realized that if Dr. Burzynski's discovery—which he owned the patent for—received a fair review, chemotherapy and radiation would rapidly dwindle into obscurity, effectively crippling the industry. Not only that, but if antineoplastons were approved, billions of dollars of cancer research funds would get funneled over to one single scientist who had exclusive patent rights...

Dr. Richard Crout, Director of the FDA Bureau of Drugs, once wrote in a 1982 newsletter:

"I never have and never will approve a new drug to an individual, but only to a large pharmaceutical firm with unlimited finances."

It became clear that ever since 1977, when Dr. Burzynski first tried to get antineoplastons approved, the FDA had begun scheming to eliminate the threat he and his discovery posed to the entire cancer industry...

The Harassment Continues Unabated

The FDA, under the direction of Commissioner Dr. David Kessler, called no fewer than FOUR different grand jury investigations into Dr. Burzynski's practice, despite the fact that none of the grand juries ever found him to be at fault, and no indictment ever came from any of the investigations.

But the FDA did not let up.

Finally, in 1995, just days after the final grand jury investigation, which also had found no fault, Dr. Burzynski was inexplicably indicted on charges of fraud, and 75 counts of violating federal law. If found guilty, he now faced 290 years in federal prison, and $18.5 million in fines.

A year later, in a bizarre twist brought about by congressional and public pressure, the FDA agreed to accept all of Dr. Burzynski's patients into a series of 72 FDA-supervised phase 2 clinical trials.

A 1996 article in The Washington Post noted:

"The prosecution marks the first time the FDA has tried to jail a scientist for using a drug on which he is conducting FDA authorized clinical trials."

Federal Government Spent $60 Million Trying to Bury Dr. Burzynski

This second trial cost American tax payers a whopping $60 million just in legal fees alone—that's not counting the cost of continually harassing him (including several raids on his office) and his patients over the preceding 11 years. Dr. Burzynski spent $2.2 million on his own defense, $700,000 of which was raised by Dr. Julian Whitaker through requests for donations in his newsletter Health & Healing.

On March 4, 1997, the judge declared it a mistrial, due to a deadlocked jury. However, after stating the government had not presented sufficient evidence in its case, he ordered that Dr. Burzynski be acquitted of 42 of the 75 counts.

But the FDA wasn't done yet. They took him to court AGAIN!

Third Time's the Charm...

At this point, many were becoming increasingly aware that something very bizarre and unusual was going on. Jurors from the first trial even joined patients in protests outside the court house. One clear-headed juror from the previous trial stated:

"Please don't waste my money abusing the system to make sure that you maintain your power!"

On May 28, 1997, after three hours of deliberation, the jury came back with their final verdict: Not Guilty.

By now you're probably thinking that this victory surely must mark the end of the wrongful harassment of Dr. Burzynski.

But no. It gets worse.

Secret Dealings Hide True Intents

While this ongoing drama unfolded over the course of more than a decade, something even more sinister was taking place behind the scenes, unbeknownst to Dr. Burzynski and his legal counsel.

In 1989, Dr. Burzynski had retained Dr. Dvorit Samid as a research consultant, and she did a lot of work with the antineoplaston ingredients. At the time, Dr. Samid worked at the Uniformed Services Medical School in Baltimore. She later transferred to the National Cancer Institute.

By 1990—while the Texas medical board kept filing one amended complaint after the other against Dr. Burzynski, in an effort to revoke his license—he had decided that the easiest way to keep the government from putting him out of business or in prison, was to partner with a pharmaceutical company. As luck would have it, he'd treated the sister-in-law of the Chairman and CEO of Élan Pharmaceuticals, and Élan eagerly drafted a letter of intent stating they would aggressively pursue the filing of the necessary protocols with the FDA for approval and marketing of antineoplastons.

Dr. Samid began working closely with Élan on the project. But once the financing, licensing agreements and royalties had been negotiated and agreed upon, Élan suddenly changed its tune, stating they had significant doubt as to whether the active substances could be patented, which would render an agreement meaningless.

As it turns out, Élan had instead partnered with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), where Dr. Samid got the position of section chief. They then co-sponsored laboratory research and clinical trials on just one of the antineoplastons' ingredients—an ingredient that Dr. Burzynski had NOT been able to patent due to the fact that it was already known. However, he had also already determined it to be very limited in terms of effectiveness on its own, over a decade ago.

Élan and the NCI spent tens of millions of dollars testing this single ingredient... Not surprisingly, it failed. Dr. Burzynski had already established that the ingredients must be used in combination in order to be effective. After realizing they could not duplicate the effectiveness of Dr. Burzynski's antineoplastons, the NCI finally agreed to conduct his clinical trials under the direction of Dr. Michael Friedman.

Sabotaging Trials—Par the Course for the National Cancer Institute

How do you sabotage a clinical trial?

It's actually easier than you might think. You'll have to watch the film to get all the details, but in summary, the trials were closed prior to completion, and were written off with the statement that "no conclusion can be made about the effectiveness or toxicity of antineoplastons." But it was clear, based on the study data, that seven of the nine patients enrolled received NO antineoplastons whatsoever! The others received dosages that were far lower than recommended.

Adding insult to injury, in 1999, about a year after Dr. Burzynski had been acquitted a third and final time, the NCI published these invalid trials in the medical literature, citing antineoplastons as a complete failure. So sure, Dr. Burzynski was a free man; cleared of all charges and free to practice medicine, but now the National Cancer Institute had effectively undermined the credibility and commercial viability of his medical discovery...

What the film reveals next, truly boggles the mind.

After the National Cancer Institute intentionally violated all protocols of their own antineoplaston trials, and after all state and federal agencies had failed in their 14-year campaign to remove Burzynski from society—after all of the dust settled—a profound truth began to emerge.

Theft and Patent Infringement—All in a Day's Work

In October 1991—while the Texas medical board kept filing amended complaints against him in an effort to revoke his license, due to pressure from the FDA—the National Cancer Institute (NCI) had conducted a site visit to Dr. Burzynski's clinic, and verified that "anti-tumor activity was documented by the use of antineoplastons."

As it turns out, a mere 17 days after this visit, the United States of America as represented by "The Department of Health and Human Services," filed a patent for antineoplastons AS2-1... one of the two antineoplastons Dr. Burzynski had already patented.

The inventor listed?

"Dr. Dvorit Samid," Dr. Burzynski's former research consultant. The patent states:

"The invention described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the government, for governmental purposes, without the payment to us of any royalties thereon."

Over the next four years, while the witch hunt to put Dr. Burzynski behind bars was in full swing, the US Government filed 10 more patents antineoplastons.

By the summer of 1995, around the time that Burzynski was indicted for fraud and 75 counts of violating federal law, Dr. Michael Friedman—who sabotaged the NCI antineoplastons trials—had left the NCI and become Deputy Commissioner of Operations for the FDA, working directly under FDA Commissioner Dr. David Kessler—the man responsible for dragging Dr. Burzynski in front of no less than four different grand juries a few years earlier.

In November of 1995, a month into Dr. Burzynski's trial, where he faced 290 years in prison, the US Patent office approved the first US Government patent for antineoplastons. Between 1995 and 2000, the US Patent office approved all 11 copycat patents on antineoplastons AS2-1....

Who Pays for Their Crimes?

By now your head is probably spinning, so let's recap.

Dr. Burzynski developed a cancer treatment that surpassed all other treatments on the market, and the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry, and the National Cancer Institute all knew it. They also knew he was the sole owner of the patents for this therapy, and these two facts combined, threatened the entire paradigm of the cancer industry.

The cancer paradigm is based on very expensive machines and toxic drugs. There's an enormous amount of money to be made in this paradigm, and Dr. Burzynski single-handedly threatened to overturn it.

So they tried to copy his invention using a single non-patented ingredient. It failed. The next step was to steal the whole thing right from under him. There was just one problem. They knew they couldn't use the stolen patents as long as Dr. Burzynski walked free and had the ability to defend his rights to them... So they concocted 75 fraudulent charges to tuck him away in jail for the rest of his life.

Fortunately for us, they failed in that too.

Dr. Whitaker sums it up nicely when he says:

"How can the US Patent office be corrupted to the point they issue patents for a medical treatment that's already been patented and issue them to someone who had nothing to do with their discovery or use? And how can the Patent office then assign these fraudulent patents to some of the most powerful institutions in the American government? And, imagine, all of this was done while these same agencies were spending millions of taxpayer dollars trying to put Dr. Burzynski in jail, so he could not fight the criminal theft of his discovery!"

As I said in the beginning, the facts of this case challenge the mind of any sane and rational person, but make no mistake about it: These things did happen, and Dr. Burzynski has all the documentation to back it up.

The US Government did harass and intimidate, and they did try to falsely imprison a brilliant scientist, simply because he'd discovered an effective cancer therapy, while simultaneously engaging in patent infringement.

Now, while this was an enormous personal hardship for Dr. Burzynski, the US Government also, through their enormous greed, in a very direct way prevented millions of cancer patients to receive a non-toxic therapy that could have saved their life. Remember, Dr. Burzynski has been trying to get antineoplastons reviewed and approved since 1977, to no avail. It's absolutely heartbreaking to consider the cost of this criminal behavior in terms of human life, including young children.

The Deadly, But Highly Profitable, Cancer Paradigm

While the stolen patents are filled with useful information about the benefits and efficacy of antineoplastons, one statement in particular sums up the problem with the current cancer paradigm:

"Current approaches to combat cancer rely primarily on the use of chemicals and radiation, which are themselves carcinogenic and may promote recurrences and the development of metastatic disease."

Dr. Burzynski's therapy, as you may recall, is non-toxic, giving patients the option to at least not suffer more grievous harm from the treatment itself, in addition to a significantly greater chance of being cured.

I'm sure that whenever someone donates their hard-earned money or participates in a pink-ribbon walkathon, they believe they're doing a good thing. They believe they're helping fund vital cancer research that will hopefully, some day, find a cure for cancer. Little do they know that much of this money goes toward perpetuating the status quo of cancer treatment, namely highly toxic drugs and expensive machines—the same old paradigm centered around profit.

As of 2010, the National Cancer Institute's annual budget is $5.2 billion. Dr. Burzynski cannot get a single dime of it. All of his research into antineoplastons over the past 35 years has been self-funded.

Think about that for a moment. Not one dime has been funneled toward developing one of the most promising cancer therapies to emerge in the past three decades... Are you still convinced they have your best interest at heart, and are diligently working to "find a cure for cancer"?

16 YEAR-OLD ALEC LOORZ IS SUING THE GOVERNMENT

"This morning I filed a lawsuit against the United States of America, for allowing money to be more powerful than the survival of my generation, and for making decisions that threaten our right to a safe and healthy planet. Our parents’ and grandparents’ generations have created a problem..."





Youth climate activists in all 50 states and the District of Columbia announced today that they're suing the government in order to create an "atmospheric trust," arguing that public trust law should protect the atmosphere for people and future generations. You can read more about the lawsuit on Loorz's iMatter March website. Below is a guest post from Alec Loorz, the 16 year-old founder of Kids vs. Global Warming and now organizer of the iMatter March. -Ben Jervey

I am 16 years old. This morning I filed a lawsuit against the United States of America, for allowing money to be more powerful than the survival of my generation, and for making decisions that threaten our right to a safe and healthy planet.

Our parents’ and grandparents’ generations have created a problem. They’ve developed a society that depends on burning fossil fuels, like coal and oil, to survive. They never realized that there were any huge consequences to running our lives with fossil fuels. But now, we do. Our addiction to fossil fuels is messing up the perfect balance of nature and threatening the survival of my generation. If we continue to hide in denial and avoid taking action, I and my generation will be forced to grow up in a world where hurricanes as big as Katrina are normal, people die every year because of heat waves, droughts, and floods, and entire species of animals we’ve come to know disappear right before our eyes.

This is not the future I want. And I know that we still have a chance to turn this picture around. But, it’s going to take more than changing lightbulbs and buying hybrid cars. I believe it will take nothing less than a revolution... a revolution in our entire culture and way of thinking, so that we value nature and the future of my generation with every action we take.

And I believe this revolution needs to be led by youth. It’s our future we’re fighting for, and we are some of the most creative, dedicated, and passionate people on the planet. We have the moral authority to look into our parents and leaders eyes and ask them, “Do I matter to you?”

Also, as youth, we are the last group of people in the United States who don’t have any official political rights. We can’t vote, and we certainly can’t compete with rich corporate lobbyists, so we are forced to simply trust our government to make good decisions on our behalf.

However, it’s become clear that our government has failed us, by not protecting the resources on this planet we need to survive. Even though scientists overwhelmingly agree that carbon emissions are totally messing up the balance of our atmosphere, our leaders continue to turn their backs on this crisis.

The time has come for the youngest generation to hold our leaders accountable for their actions.

Today, I and other fellow young people are suing the government, for handing over our future to unjust fossil fuel industries, and ignoring the right of our children to inherit the planet that has sustained all of civilization. I will join with youth and attorneys in every state to demand that our leaders live and govern as if our future matters.

The government has a legal responsibility to protect the future for our children. So we are demanding that they recognize the atmosphere as a commons that needs to be preserved, and commit to a plan to reduce emissions to a safe level.

The plaintiffs and petitioners on all the cases are young people. We are standing up for our future.

But we will not only stand up in the courts. We will stand up in the streets as well.

Starting this Mothers’ Day weekend, the youngest generation will rise up and march in our communities. We will unite together with a powerful voice to call for action on climate change, and demand that our society lives as if our future matters.

We will let the world know that climate change is not about money, it’s not about power, it’s not about convenience. It’s about our future. It’s about the survival of this and every generation to come.

The iMatter March is a series of more than 100 marches in states all across the country, and 25 countries worldwide, including Columbia, Gambia, Germany, Thailand, India, and Nepal (on Mount Everest). There’s even one being planned by the son of an oil executive in Kuwait.

And it’s about more than just these events. This is a movement. A mass movement of young people standing up with a unified voice to tell the ruling generation that we will no longer just sit idly by as they make decisions that threaten our future. We matter. Our future matters.

Thomas Jefferson once said, “Every generation needs a new revolution.” Well this is ours. The time has now come for the youngest generation to make a stand for our future.

This is our revolution. This is our time.

Alec Loorz is the founder of the iMatter campaign and of Kids vs Global Warming. A climate change activist since he was 12 years old, he has spoken to nearly 200,000 people in over 200 presentations, keynotes, and panels. Representing his generation, he advocates for and inspires youth to lead the way to a sustainable and just world. www.iMatterMarch.org to march in your community.

Monday, June 13, 2011

ONCE UPON A TIME




ONCE UPON A TIME, By Fiona Cristian


TO VIEW THE INCREDIBLE STORYTELLING VIDEO, FOLLOW THIS LINK: http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1388008508321&comments


TO READ THE STORY, SEE BELOW:

A Grandmother and her grandchildren are walking through a forest when one of the grandchildren breaks a small branch off a tree. The Grandmother stops walking.

Grandmother - Did you break that branch to bring sunlight to the flowers beneath?

Tom - No, Grandmother, they are violets that like the shade.

Grandmother - Did you break it because you wanted to take blossoms to your mother?

Tom - No, Grandmother, there are no blossoms on this branch.

Grandmother - Then why did you break the branch, Grandson?

Tom - I guess I wasn’t thinking, Grandmother. I have broken the tree for no reason.

Sam - But there are so many trees in the forest, Grandmother, why does it hurt that Tom broke just one?

Grandmother - Children, if there are many of you and I hurt just one of you, does it matter? Do you think it matters for Katie if I choose to hurt her rather than Judy? And if I hurt Katie, will I not also be harming the rest of you because you will now have doubt about how I might behave towards you. If I can hurt Katie, might I not one day hurt any of you?

Come children, this is a nice place to sit - I have a story to tell you.

THE FAIRYTALE

Once upon a time there was a world full of people who loved to be slaves. They so loved being slaves that, if anyone suggested that there might be a way not to be a slave, the slaves raised their eyebrows, gave an embarrassed laugh and turned away as quickly as they could.

The slaves lived in a beautiful world full of natural wonders; of waterfalls, lakes and powerful seas, of mountains, valleys and majestic forests and of everything they needed to live lives of joy, freedom and abundance.

Their beautiful world was what sustained them, giving them air to breathe, water to drink and food to eat. Without their beautiful world, the slaves could not survive but they had been slaves for so long that they no longer noticed that their enslavement was slowly killing the world that gave them life.

They had forgotten that they were part of their beautiful world and their beautiful world was part of them. They had forgotten who they really were.

The slaves spent most of their time giving their energy to an artificial world, a fairytale that had been superimposed over the natural, life giving one. As the fairytale had no life force energy of its own, it needed the constant input of the slaves to appear to function.

Like all slave masters, the fairytale was not kind. The slaves had to spend hours away from their families and homes “working”, just in order to have a place to live and food on the table.

There were rules and regulations that the slaves were expected to conform to and those that transgressed were severely punished.

Of course, all the slaves had to do to be free was to get together and remove their energy from the fairytale because, without them, it could only collapse. But the fairytale had systems in place to teach the slaves that they were all individuals, isolated and alone, and that a life of slavery was the only one possible.

They learnt that only slaves belonging to their particular slave group could be trusted, that their slave group was superior to any other slave group and, in some cases, that they must be prepared to fight other slaves and even die for their slave group. The fear and trauma generated by the images of the fairytale kept them firmly in their places.

Thus it was impossible for the slaves to unite despite the fact that, deep down, every slave was aware that their addiction to slavery was killing the world that gave them life.

So why did the slaves keep working for the fairytale and giving up their freedom if they knew the consequences? It was partly because the hole seemed too deep and frightening to climb out of, partly because they had been taught to expect someone else to solve their problems for them and partly because they were too tired from working so hard for the fairytale to think about it. But the main reasons the slaves kept their heads down and tails up was that they were unwilling to give up the temptations of the fairytale.

Concoctions of chemicals disguised as food, with tantalising tastes that induced cravings, despite the damage done to the body. Drinks full of poison that sent you out of your mind for a while so you could forget your worries. Shops full of things to possess, bigger, better places to live, smarter, more powerful means of transport, more exotic and exclusive places to travel to, countless coverings for the body, and an endless array of ways and means to fill the time not spent in the service of the slave master.

Upon all these things the slaves placed more value than their freedom. As long as they could have their fairytale addictions, they were willing to be slaves.

A few slaves tried to turn the tide. They tried to break free of their shackles but it was very hard. Often they were punished, ridiculed and starved back into submission, even though all they asked was to be able to take on the responsibility of caring for themselves, others and the natural world.

As time went on, the fairytale became an increasingly harsh master, demanding more and more energy from its slaves until even previously happy slaves began to feel that all was not right.

As the demands grew, so did the restrictions until the few avenues available for the slaves to take back their freedom dwindled away and the punishments for slaves attempting to do so became even more severe.

The fairytale spread over more and more of the natural world, raping, pillaging and plundering until the rivers were choked, the mountains gouged beyond recognition and the forests reduced to matchsticks teetering in dusty, barren soil.

As the air became too thick to breathe, the water too contaminated to drink and the food lost all its life forces, the slaves began dying too quickly and in numbers too large not to notice.

Too late, the slaves realised that the fairytale had nothing to offer them and that they had all but destroyed their only means of existence. Chaos all around them, the remaining slaves realised they had to change their ways before it was too late.

But where to start?

There were a few slaves who had seen the signs and hidden themselves away. They had stored clean water, kept some seeds and found the few trees left that could provide them with clean air.

As the relentless destruction trickled to a halt and Earth breathed a sigh of relief, these slaves came out of their hiding places and gathered together with the others, ready and willing to take on the job of repairing the damage done.

And perhaps, even as they looked around at the desolate remains of their once beautiful land, they smiled because they had remembered who they really were and at last they were free.

Katie – And did they do it, Grandmother? Did they save Earth?

Grandmother – Have a look around, children. Did we do it?

Judy – We? We, Grandmother? Were you one of those slaves?

Grandmother – I was.

Tom – And Grandfather?

Grandmother – Yes he was, children. Grandfather, Great Uncle Collin and Great Aunt Danielle and many of the other older men and women you know.

Sam – But how did you do it, Grandmother? How did you make Earth better? If it was all broken and dirty, how did you fix it?

Grandmother – The first thing we had to do was to look at everything we had been doing and see how we had hurt Earth. And then we had to work out how to live in ways that didn’t hurt Earth.

We realised that the only way to help Earth become the beautiful paradise it had once been was to make sure that everything we did helped Earth and didn’t hurt Earth.

Sometimes we do break branches or chop down a tree but we never do it if we don’t have a good reason. That’s why I asked Tom why he had broken the branch.

He was not thinking or feeling the tree when he broke the branch and so he was able to do harm to the tree. And you are right Sam – just one little branch doesn’t make much difference in a beautiful forest like this one, but imagine if everybody began breaking branches, thinking that just one branch wouldn’t make any difference. In time, the forest would be full of broken trees.

This is how we start to do harm children, and one seemingly small act of harm leads to complete destruction if it is repeated enough times. Now I have told you the story of how we nearly destroyed Earth before you were born, I hope that you will always be mindful of your actions so that you will never do harm to this beautiful Earth we are so lucky to live on.

Children – We will, Grandmother. Of course, Grandmother.

The End

Saturday, June 11, 2011

TOXIC OVERLOAD - 15% OF GIRLS NOW REACH PUBERTY BY AGE 7




PLEASE NOTE - the quotes below were taken from the following article and NOT from the Time magazine article:


http://preventdisease.com/news/11/060211_toxic_overload_puberty.shtml



"...early development puts them at greater risk for various problems, including increased risk of cancers, drinking, drug use, eating disorders, behavioral problems and attempted suicide, according to a 2007 report on early puberty by Steingraber. And because early puberty means that girls have estrogen in their bodies over a longer period of time they are at higher risk for developing breast and uterine cancers..."

"Although scientists profess some confusion about what's to blame for the sexual development afflicting the Barbie set, they suspect some of the obvious contenders that the Foundation has been writing about for years. First, there's the problem of pollution by toxins that affect hormonal systems. The water supply, for instance, has become polluted with some of the 30,000-100,000 chemicals used commercially in the US, as well as by pharmaceutical drugs and prescription hormones like HRT, birth control pills, and growth hormones for farm animals.

"We've written repeatedly about the fact that various toxins in common use have estrogenic effects, particularly endocrine disrupters like BPA, which shows up in plastic water bottles, baby bottles, and the lining of many of the canned foods on our shelves. As I've noted, it's the petrochemical-based xenoestrogens in the environment that cause the greatest harm. Not only are these xenoestrogens omnipresent, they are considerably more potent than estrogen made by the ovaries -- some even potent in amounts as small as a billionth of a gram. The body can't produce enough natural progesterone to oppose the xenoestrogens, which leads to a host of severe health problems, including early puberty as well as increased risk of cancers, tumors, weight gain, depression, autoimmune deficiency, and so on.

Friday, June 10, 2011

E-COLI OUTBREAK IS GMO BIOLOGICAL WARFARE

BROTHERS AND SISTERS - PLEASE AWAKEN! Listen and learn. This is an incredibly important podcast about the true nature of the e-coli outbreak and the sinister agenda of biological warfare that is now being unleashed against humanity.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Monday, June 6, 2011

BEENI BABY "HATS" RECALLED DUE TO ASPHYXIATION HAZARD

Even looking at this "hat" (otherwise known as a torture device) makes me feel ill. Puts me in mind of the gag balls they shove into the mouths of women who are involved in the pornography industry. How could any parent allow their child to be suffocated in this way? What is wrong with our species?

http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml11/11741.html


IS YOUR BABY CIRCUMCISED? WANNA KNOW WHERE HIS FORESKIN ENDS UP?



TO THOSE WHO HAVE WILLINGLY CIRCUMCISED THEIR SONS.... Wanna know where you babies foreskin ends up?

Source Article:
Babies' foreskin used to make cosmetics- Is this ethical?
http://www.blogher.com/babies-foreskin-used-make-cosmetics-ethical


"The question of whether or not to circumcise their newborn baby boy is often the first of many life-altering decisions parents makes on behalf of their baby. Whether you find yourself for or against circumcision is not the subject of this article (though it could be a subset of it). The issue in question is whether or not it's ethical to use babies' foreskins in the making of cosmetics.

What happens to a baby boy's foreskin after it's removed in the hospital? Naturally, you might think that it is disposed of with other "medical waste," but as I recently learned, that's not always the case. There is, in fact, big money to be made in the foreskin business, not just the money gained from the removal, but from what becomes of the foreskin after the fact. Laura Hopper, a midwife who blogs at Alternative Birth Services recently wrote that wrinkle treatments are being made using American babies' foreskins. Hopper quotes two articles, both detailing the use of baby foreskin in the cosmetic industry. From Acroposthion:

The most disturbing and alarming [controversy] is in the unethical trafficking of neonate foreskins. Not only do parents of North American baby boys have to pay between $200 to $300 to obstetricians to circumcise their boys that no sooner are the circumcised foreskins cut off that they are sold on to bio-engineering and cosmetics companies by the hospitals.

The resale value of neonate foreskins is astronomically dizzying in that from one boy’s foreskin can be grown bio-engineered skin in a lab to the size of a football field. That’s 4 acres of new skin or around 200,000 units of manufactured skin, which is enough skin to cover about 250 people and sells at $3,000 a square foot. Considering that there are 1.25 million neonate foreskins circumcised each year in the U.S alone this translates to one of the most lucrative trades, if not THE most lucrative trade in human body parts ever in the history of humanity.

Hopper ends her post saying, "Wake up people, your children are being exploited for profit."

I have to believe that many parents wouldn't stand for such a thing if they knew it was going on. Although I chose to leave my son's penis intact, I would never think to ask my doctor, "What is going to happen with my son's foreskin after it's removed?" But surely parents have to consent to this sort of thing, don't they? Is it listed in the fine print somewhere on the parental surgical consent form? If it's not, is this ethical?

Jennifer Lance at Eco Child's Play seemed shocked herself at the news when she wrote WTF? Baby Boys’ Circumcised Foreskins Used for Wrinkle Treatments and said, "Glad my son’s foreskin is still where it belongs on his penis and not injected into some old woman’s face looking for the fountain of youth."

According to Summer Minor who blogs at Wired for Noise, the use of baby foreskin to make cosmetics isn't anything new. Back in 2007, she wrote Human Foreskins are Big Business for Cosmetics.

Foreskin fibroblasts are used to grow and cultivate new cells that are then used for a variety of purposes. From the fibroblasts new skin for burn victims can be grown, skin to cover diabetic ulcers, and controversially it is also used to make cosmetic creams and collagens. One foreskin can be used for decades to grow $100,000 worth of fibroblasts.

Minor reports that back in 2007 concern was growing over the ethics behind using human foreskin for cosmetic purposes. "One such cosmetic company, SkinMedica is raising a stir over their use of the growth hormone left over from growing artificial skin from foreskin fibroblasts."

SkinMedica, which sells for over $100 for a 63-oz. bottle, was made famous by Oprah Winfrey and Barbara Walters. Winfrey in fact has promoted SkinMedica several times on her show and website. Discussions about the ethics of using human foreskins for vanity have been circulating on the web but there has not been a response from Winfrey on this debate.

According to an article by Amanda Euringer on The Tyee, "in a discussion on Mothering.com, one querent asked, 'If the cream was made from the bi-product of baby afro-American clitoral skin, would Oprah still be promoting it?' There's no answer to that question on Mothering or Winfrey's site, and Winfrey declined The Tyee's request for an interview." Go figure.

There are uses for removed foreskin that may seem slightly less controversial like using it to create bio-engineered skin for burns, persistent leg ulcers, bed sores, reconstructive surgery and other skin problems. The Foreskin Mafia writes, "Now, circumcision really does have health benefits, only it’s not the baby boys who are losing parts of their penises who benefit."

In case you are wondering if your cosmetics were made from foreskins, it's not as easy as looking for the word "foreskin" in the ingredients. After all the foreskin is not actually an ingredient, but is used as a culture to grow other cells which are then used in the cosmetic. The ingredient you are looking for is likely called Tissue Nutrient Solution or TNS™, human collagen or human fibroblast.

What do you think? If you circumcised your son, do you care what happened to his foreskin after it was removed? Is it ethical to use babies' foreskins for cosmetic purposes? Is this money maker part of a conspiracy to encourage Americans to continue circumcising their sons?"




More article below:



Where do our foreskins go?
https://www.newsday.co.zw/2014/04/26/foreskins-go/


The Foreskins in Oprah's Facecream
http://www.drmomma.org/2009/10/foreskins-in-oprahs-facecream.html



3 Strange Uses For Infant Foreskins
http://www.babble.com/mom/3-strange-uses-for-infant-foreskins/

PERINATAL PITOCIN EXPOSURE = ADHD IN CHILDREN

"Results revealed a strong predictive relationship between perinatal Pitocin exposure and subsequent childhood ADHD onset..." LABOR DRUGS ARE CAUSING NEUROLOGICAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EMOTIONAL DEFICITS IN OUR CHILDREN. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21527574


Perinatal Pitocin as an early ADHD biomarker: neurodevelopmental risk?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21527574

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a potential relationship between coincidental increases in perinatal Pitocin usage and subsequent childhood ADHD onset in an attempt to isolate a specific risk factor as an early biomarker of this neurodevelopmental disorder.

METHOD: Maternal labor/delivery and corresponding childbirth records of 172 regionally diverse, heterogeneous children, ages 3 to 25, were examined with respect to 21 potential predictors of later ADHD onset, including 17 selected obstetric complications, familial ADHD incidence, and gender. ADHD diagnosis and history of perinatal Pitocin exposure distinguished groups for comparison.

RESULTS: Results revealed a strong predictive relationship between perinatal Pitocin exposure and subsequent childhood ADHD onset (occurring in 67.1% of perinatal Pitocin cases vs. 35.6% in nonexposure cases, χ(2)=16.99, p<.001). Fetal exposure time, gestation length, and labor length also demonstrated predictive power, albeit significantly lower.

CONCLUSION: The findings warrant further investigation into the potential link between perinatal Pitocin exposure and subsequent ADHD diagnosis.