Wednesday, October 26, 2011

UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING UNETHICAL AND CRIMINAL



"MOTIVES IN FALSE MEDICAL POLICIES TO TRAIN DOCTORS TO DO EARLY UMBILICAL CORD CLAMPING:

The motive in the training of current doctors is probably linked to harvesting the placenta for valuable nutrients and hormones and stem cells trapped in the placenta. The early umbilical cord clamping is highly unethical, if not criminal to harvest the nutrients and hormones and sell them to the highest bidder. The duty is to protect the baby who cannot give informed consent. The placenta blood belongs inside the baby and should not be given to others. The baby is too small and unprotected to donate blood to another's cause or need.


The selling of the baby's placenta and the placenta blood trapped in it has been done mostly without informed parental consent. The institutions have parents sign a form for appropriate discarding of the placenta. What does that mean?! That is not informed consent to give up the hormones and the genetic information in any one cell. Doctors may think if they send home a living mother and child, they did their duty. Not so if there was a breach of trust in the performance of their duty. This applies to the duty of the hospital's administration, ethics committees and the nurses and their profession of best practice possible, least risk of harm...

NATURAL BIRTH VERSE ACTIVE MANAGEMENT:

No baby is safe in active management, not the premature, the c-section or the full term baby. All babies can benefit from a a natural birth and a birth contract what cannot be done to the mother or to the child. All mothers can contract not to clamp or cut the cord at all. This is the Lotus Birth. In the olden days, the placenta was simply put in a diaper and allowed to fall off in a day or two after birth. There were "no cord infections and the baby got all the blood from the placenta and had healthy immunities. Not so today. Why not? Think about it. Would you rather have a healthy baby, not one harvested for its precious components of blood, particularly the stem cells and to have the child umbilical cord off naturally in two days? Or, would you prefer to nurse back a medically caused sick baby, often injected with "stuff" soon after birth, while the child was blood deprived, anemic and with low immunities by that fact? The sick baby will needs its mother to fight cord infections from five days to up to 15 days by a cut cord?...

All babies so early clamped are endangered to lung problems for lack of blood absorbing the water fluid in the lungs and to carry the oxygen by the red (iron-rich) blood cells. They are subjected to other internal disorders, including the number one cause of a 900 percent increase in autistic children and those with holes in their heart. It is just logical low blood volume and pressured babies will have problems of some nature - and it "is" known to be linked to doctors trained to accommodate blood harvesting by doing early umbilical cord clamping. The policies are there to give the doctors an alibi not to be charged with criminal assault and the nurses from aiding in failing to put in a fault report on the doctors. They make no report on the condition of the cord when clamped and the amount of blood later drained from the placenta. Why not. That takes cooperation of concealment, too, by the hospitals lab and the administration and ethics board of most hospitals...

CHECK OUT THE INCREASE OF INTERNAL DISORDERS AND THE YOUNG AGES OF THE AFFLICTED:

Some babies are being discovered with muscle disorders, as young as 13 months, diagnosed with MS. Some children, as young as 13, have thyroid problems. Often the thyroid problems are related to the drugs given the mother during labor, such as oxytocin. Oxytocin is often given without informed consent on the pretense it stops bleeding. Oxytocin frequently contains an ingredient chlorobutanol that is alleged to cause the latent thyroid problems in either the mother or the child, or both...

...this child's blood is valued for one single unit of stem cell blood to fetch $30,000, or at the most another $150.00 extra billing fee, for just plain ordinary "white" blood?...

The system is not trust worthy. It never was. It has always been based around drugs, which manipulate the birth to the staff and/or the doctors busy time schedule. Inductions of labor are unsafe...

There, is a report by Dr. Gabbes, that directed it was okay for the convenience of the doctor to clamp the child's lifeline, as his/her own convenience. He boldly stated, the amount of blood, in most instances, was not of importance. Tell that to the Michael Chow, living blind, deaf, and paralyzed, after immediate cord clamping caused him to be anemic by 50 percent.

When a medical doctor was reported for doing immediate cord clamping on all c-sectioned babies, the CPS-BC would not investigate the training of the doctor, stating he had a defense in this data base of this American doctor's opinion, not important, doctors own choice of convenience.

No where was the well-being of the child mentioned; nor the right of the parents to have been informed no clamping of the cord is necessary, and not a medical need, unless the cord tore or for placenta previa. The cord, again, need not be clamped at all, ever. That is the "pioneer" Lotus Birth - a right of choice to all mothers, and best put into a written and Signed Contract."

NATRUAL BIRTH!!! (LOTUS BIRTH.....)
http://eabicbahamas.ning.com/profiles/blogs/natrual-birth-lotus-birth