Tuesday, August 16, 2011

TWO-THIRDS OF OB-GYN CLINICAL GUIDELINES HAVE NO BASIS IN SCIENCE





Talk about "evidence-based" pregnancy and maternity care is all the rage these days. Yet, recommendations for patient care put forth by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology have been "found to be based on opinion and inconsistent evidence."

With standard medical practices leading to more than 1 out of 3 women having a c-section, and with skyrocketing rates of women experiencing post-partum depression, breastfeeding issues, and even symptoms of post-traumatic stress due to severe birth trauma, I'd say we have a very serious problem on our hands.

"WASHINGTON, D.C. (August 15, 2011)—A study published this month in *Obstetrics & Gynecology,* the journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, found that barely one-third of the organization’ s clinical guidelines for OB/GYN practice meet the Level A standard of “good and consistent scientific evidence.” The authors of the study found instead that the majority of ACOG recommendations for patient care rank at Levels B and C, based on research that relies on “limited or inconsistent evidence” and on “expert opinion,” both of which are known to be inadequate predictors of safety or efficacy.

“The fact that so few of the guidelines that govern routine OB/GYN care in this country are supported by solid scientific evidence—and worse, are far more likely to be based on anecdote and opinion—is a sobering reminder that our maternity care system is in urgent need of reform,” said Katherine Prown, PhD, Campaign Manager of The Big Push for Midwives. “As the authors of the study remind us, guidelines are only as good as the evidence that supports them.”

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 22 on the management of fetal macrosomia—infants weighing roughly 8 ½ lbs or more at birth—illustrates the possible risks to mothers and babies of relying on unscientific clinical guidelines. The only Level A evidence-based recommendation on the delivery of large-sized babies the Bulletin makes is to caution providers that the methods for detection are imprecise and unreliable. Yet at the same time, the Bulletin makes a Level C opinion-based recommendation that, despite the lack of a reliable diagnosis, women with “suspected” large babies should be offered potentially unnecessary cesarean sections as a precaution, putting mothers at risk of surgical complications and babies at risk of being born too early.

“It’s no wonder that the cesarean rate is going through the roof and women are seeking alternatives to hospital-based OB/GYN care in unprecedented numbers,” said Susan M. Jenkins, Legal Counsel of The Big Push for Midwives. “ACOG’s very own recommendations give its members permission to follow opinion-based practice guidelines that have far more to do with avoiding litigation than with adhering to scientific, evidence-based principles about what’s best for mothers and babies.”

The Big Push for Midwives Campaign represents tens of thousands of grassroots advocates in the United States who support expanding access to Certified Professional Midwives and out-of-hospital maternity care. The mission of The Big Push for Midwives is to educate state and national policymakers and the general public about the reduced costs and improved outcomes associated with out-of-hospital maternity care and to advocate for expanding access to the services of Certified Professional Midwives, who are specially trained to provide it."


Media inquiries: Katherine Prown (414) 550-8025, katie@pushformidwives.org

Scientific Evidence Underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Practice Bulletins
http://bit.ly/nfF5rB